- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: "All Souls" Outlaw Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
"All Souls" Outlaw Paper "All Souls" Ancillary Paper Rubric Code: BX94B27 By PVHarmon Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Outlaw-10th Grade
	A (N/A)	B (N/A)	C (N/A)	D< (N/A)
Introduction	A Creative Hook draws reader in; Minimal background, References memoir and author, logical lead to thesis statement	B Hook that draws reader in, references memoir and author, logical lead in to thesis statement	C Hook within play, references memoir or author, weak connection to thesis staatement	D< No hook, no reference to either memoir or author, awkward or no connection to thesis statement, repetitive
Thesis/Topic sentence	A Clear and specific to topic; answers EQ; concise, MAP is obvious interesting and well-written; thesis-topic sentences "match"	B specific to topic; coherent; Answers EQ,Specific, MAP is obvious; thesis and topic sentences "match" and connect to thesis	C Thesis-topic sentences somewhat clear, connected to topic; attempts to answer EQ, non-specific MAP is vague;topic sentences do not necessarily "match" thesis	D< Thesis-topic sentences lack clarity and direction; MAP vague or missing, Essential Question not answered, disconnected throughout
Evidence choice/usage	A Excellent choice of evidence, creatively connected to thesis, smoothly integrated	B Strong choice of evidence, connected to thesis, integration attempted	C Repetitive choice of evidence; not integrated	D< Poor choice of evidence, integrated using "in this quote" or something similar
Analysis of Evidence	A Explanation is creative and logical.	B Explanation is logical	C Vague explanation	D< Commentary on evidence illogical
Mechanics	A Minimal or no mechanical errors; Evidence of proofreading; Correct cite; no "bad words",	B Minimal errors. Some evidence of proofreading, minimal use of "bad words", grammatically correct	C Errors that might interfere with understanding. Poor proofreading, some use of "bad words"	D< Errors interfere with understanding. No proofreading. "Bad words" abound,
Conclusion	A Does not repeat Intro/ Thesis Statement, speaks to the "Big Picture"; Leaves reader with something to think about	B Somewhat repeats Intro/Thesis Statement, Speaks of "Big Picture", Leaves reader with thoughts	C Repeats Intro or Thesis Statement, Neglects to step outside of paper. Flat	D< Little to no conclusion, leaves reader asking "So What?"