Skip to main content
iRubric: LAW100 Class Project rubric

iRubric: LAW100 Class Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
LAW100 Class Project 
Rubric Code: BX796A5
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Law  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric LAW100 Class Project
  Exemplary

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Average

6 pts

Fair

4 pts

Poor

0 pts

Meets Basic Assignment Criteria
Understands Assignment

If this box is checked for the poor or fair evaluation criteria, the document will receive a failing grade and no further evaluation will be conducted

Exemplary

Submision demonstrates a full and clear understanding of the assignment as it relates to a business law course
Good

Submission demonstrates a solid understanding of the assignment as it relates to a business law course
Average

Submission shows a basic, but minimal understanding of the nature of the assignment as it relates to a business law course
Fair

Submission shows very little understanding of the nature of the assignment as it relates to a business law course
Poor

Submission shows no basic understanding of the nature of the assignment as it relates to a business law course
Issues and Precedents
Identification

Identify the legal issues in the cases

Exemplary

Identifies & understands almost all of the main issues.
Good

Identifies & understands most of the main issues.
Average

Identifies & understands some of the main issues.
Fair

Identifies & understands few of the main issues.
Poor

Identifies & understands almost none of the issues presented.
Laws and Precedents

Identify the laws and legal precedents that pertain to the legal issues

Exemplary

Identifies, demonstrates and/or understands all of laws and legal precedents.
Good

Identifies, demonstrates and/or understands most of laws and legal precedents.
Average

Identifies, demonstrates and/or understands some of laws and legal precedents.
Fair

Identifies, demonstrates and/or understands few of laws and legal precedents.
Poor

Identifies, demonstrates and/or understands none of laws and legal precedents.
Analysis of Issues

For each issue, compare both existing legislation and case law with the facts presented in this case.

Exemplary

Very thorough and insightful analysis of each of the the issues using the laws and precedents and handled each of the issues separately prior to a clear conclusion or summary
Good

Reasonably thorough analysis of each of the issues using the facts presented, laws and case precedents and handled each of the issues separately prior to a clear conclusion or summary
Average

Somewhat thorough analysis of the issues presented using the facts presented, laws and case precedents and handled each of the issues separately prior to a clear conclusion or summary
Fair

Marginal analysis of each of the separate issues using the relevant facts, laws and case precedents and/or was not able to separate issues
Poor

Was not able to analyze the issues using facts presented, laws and case precedents and/or was not able to separate issues for analysis.
Decisions
Decision

For each issue presented, and based upon existing law. discuss and determine how each issue should be resolved.

Exemplary

Clearly made a decision based on the issues and precedent - i.e., demonstrated mastery of the process
Good

Made a decision based on the issues and precedent on a basic level
Average

Somewhat clearly made a decision based on the issues and precedent
Fair

Either decision was not clear, or the decision was made without adequate legal basis
Poor

Did not make a decision on the issues presented based on precedent, and did not defend the case
Reason for Decision

Was able to communicate logically why he/she chose the winner in the case.

Exemplary

Thoroughly and logically explained decision in the case.
Good

Offered a competent explaination of the decision in the case.
Average

Logically explained decision in the case on a basic level.
Fair

The explanation for the case has many faults.
Poor

Did not defend the case
Opposing Opinion

Based on the precedent and issues, discuss any reasons why the opposing party may prevail when this case goes to court.

Exemplary

Thoroughly and logically explained the opposing opinion in the case.
Good

Offered a competent explaination of the opposing opinion in the case.
Average

Explained the opposing opinion in the case on a basic level.
Fair

The explanation for the opposing opinion had many faults.
Poor

Did not discuss the opposing opinion in the case
Writing Skills
Writing Errors

These errors include spelling, grammar, word usage, capitalization, spelling, paragraphing, word use, etc.

Exemplary

Writing has few, if any, compositional errors
Good

Occasional errors or misspellings
Average

More than occasional errors or misspellings
Fair

Frequent compositional errors or misspellings, but the exam can be read
Poor

The document is difficult to be read due to errors or misspellings
Organization

Exemplary

The document is well organized
Good

The document is fairly well organized
Average

The document is somewhat organized
Fair

The document is unorganized, but can be read
Poor

The document is unorganized to the point being virtually unreadable
Electronic Sumbission

Exemplary

The document demonstrates excellent Submission skills
Good

The document demonstrates a solid understanding of the basic elements of submission
Average

The document demonstrates a basic level of submission criterion, but still contains major deficiencies
Fair

The document submission shows some submission criterion,
Poor

The document submision clearly does not comply with the basic requirments of APA format










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16