- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Plate tectonics - Become a teacher rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Plate tectonics - Become a teacher Plate tectonics CPO Plate tectonics activity with bathymetric map shows prediction of plate movements in 50 million years Rubric Code: BX452C6 By rnesel Draft Public Rubric Subject: Geology Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Plate Tectonics Become a Teacher
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Knowledge of plates Identifying and outlining the largest tectonic plates and their boundaries. Movement of the plates indicated with arrows to show the direction the plates are moving.	Excellent Identified and discussed all three plate boundaries correctly using correct scientific terms	Good Identified and discussed at least 2 plate boundaries correctly but failed to use accurate scientific terms.	Fair Identified and discussed at least 1 plate boundary but did not incorporate much use of key vocabulary	Poor missing
Plate movement All of the tectonic plates moved in the correct direction.	Excellent Discussed all plates moved in the correct direction	Good DIscussed most plates moved accordingly	Fair Discussed few plates were correctly relocated	Poor missing
Model creation for demo for studen Features added to the map to illustrate new mountains at convergent boundaries and new crust at divergent plate boundaries.	Excellent Model includes all landforms associated with the plate boundary are included and easily visible.	Good Model includes most, but not all, landforms associated with the plate boundary are included on the model.	Fair Model includes less than half of the landforms associated with the plate boundary are included.	Poor missing
Creativity and Engagement Ability to creatively deliver lesson and engage audience	Excellent Demo was very creative and used good models to get student engaged in activity.	Good Demo include some original thought and kept the student engaged for most of lesson.	Fair Demo lacked creativity and was monotone in presentation. Student not engaged much.	Poor missing