iRubric: Interview with Atomic theory scientist rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Interview with Atomic theory scientist

Catastrophic Event Interview

Mock interviews with Atomic scientist

Rubric Code: BB4WC3

By kellyhanaman

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 6-8

Interview Atomic Theory
	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Interview Questions Write 7-10 questions about their work on the atomic model.	Poor Questions were irrelevant to the event.	Fair The questions in the presentation were simple, literal questions and did not vary much.	Good The questions in the presentation varied, but focused too much on simple ideas.	Excellent The questions varied in type and were relevant to the event. Higher thinking questions (not just a basic "What happened?") were used correctly.
Answers	Poor The scientific answers to the interview were not given.	Fair The answers only stated basic information or incomplete explanations.	Good The scientific answers stated the correct scientific facts. Details describing the events were present, detailed and accurate.	Excellent The answers went above basic descriptions and also taught/reviewed the atomic model.
Visual Aide Have a drawing or other illustration of your scientists atomic model.	Poor The visual did not represent understanding.	Fair The visuals attempted to help teach the audience. They had limited details.	Good The visuals gave good support the the interview answers. They directly connected to interview and the audience benefited from them.	Excellent The visuals added to the overall interview. They led the audience through a professional session where they depicted the science behind the atomic model like real scientists.
Creativity	Poor Does not meet minimum requirements of illustrations.	Fair Meets minimum requirements of illustrations.	Good Colorful, good graphics	Excellent Colorful, uses different media, demonstrates individuality.
Self Reflection	Poor Did not complete self reflection	Fair Minimal effort put into self reflection	Good Good effort on self reflection	Excellent Excellent effort on self reflection