iRubric: Marching Band Adjudication Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Marching Band Adjudication Project

The purpose of this project is to learn about adjudication styles and techniques. Students will also learn observational akills and the unique nuances of a show's technical and musical effectiveness.

Rubric Code: B89C9

By jaimieabney

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Music

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Assignment
	Not Attempted 0 pts	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done 1 pts	Acceptable; Below Expectations 2 pts	Acceptable; Meets Expectations 3 pts	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectation 4 pts
Number of Score Sheets	Not Attempted Not attempted.	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done Completed up to 2 of 4 sheets. Bands were not identified properly (if website videos were used, the URLs were not included for reference).	Acceptable; Below Expectations Completed 3 of 4 sheets. Bands were not identified properly (if website videos were used, the URLs were not included for reference).	Acceptable; Meets Expectations Completed all 4 sheets. Bands were identified properly.	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectation Completed more than the required 4 sheets.
Comments/Observations	Not Attempted Not attempted.	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done Made inappropriate comments about any band that was judged.	Acceptable; Below Expectations Made fully appropriate observations about all 4 bands judged. Included less than 3 comments in each category.	Acceptable; Meets Expectations Made fully appropriate observations about all 4 bands judged. Included 3 or more comments in each category.	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectation Related what was observed and included possible ways to improve. Related observations and comments to our own band's performance.
Point Allocation	Not Attempted Not attempted.	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done Did not allocate points for every category. Did not total points on any sheet.	Acceptable; Below Expectations Allocated points for every category on less than 4 sheets. Totaled points on less than 4 sheets.	Acceptable; Meets Expectations Allocated points for every category on all 4 sheets. Totaled points on all 4 sheets.	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectation Specified points earned for each sub-category area.
Essay
	Not Attemped 0 pts	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done 1 pts	Acceptable; Below Expectations 2 pts	Acceptable; Meets Expectations 3 pts	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectations 4 pts
Relevance	Not Attemped Completely irrelevant to the topic.	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done It is unclear what the author's experience was. Details included are hard to relate to the day's activities.	Acceptable; Below Expectations Author's experience is included and opinions are clear. Does not identify knowledge gained.	Acceptable; Meets Expectations Author's experience is detailed and general thoughts and perceptions of the day are clearly conveyed. Knowledge gained is identified clearly.	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectations Future goals created due to these thoughts and experiences are conveyed.
Length	Not Attemped up to 299 words	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done 300 words	Acceptable; Below Expectations 400 words	Acceptable; Meets Expectations 500 words	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectations more than 500 words
Spelling	Not Attemped 13 or more misspelled words	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done 8-12 misspelled words	Acceptable; Below Expectations 3-7 misspelled words	Acceptable; Meets Expectations 2 or fewer misspelled words	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectations no spelling errors
Mechanics	Not Attemped 13 or more capitalization or punctuation mistakes. No paragraphs attempted.	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done 8-12 capitalization or punctuation mistakes. Unclear paragraph formation.	Acceptable; Below Expectations 3-7 capitalization or punctuation mistakes. Randomly formed paragraphs.	Acceptable; Meets Expectations 2 or fewer capitalization or punctuation mistakes. Deliberately formed paragraphs.	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectations No mechanical mistakes. Excellent overall flow/correct paragraph formation.
Neatness	Not Attemped Illegible penmanship. Absolutely un-readable.	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done Handwritten, many erasure marks. Paper is crumpled, torn, or has scrunchies. Semi-clear penmanship.	Acceptable; Below Expectations Handwritten, few erasure marks. Clean paper, no scrunchies. Clear penmanship.	Acceptable; Meets Expectations Typed and well-formatted.	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectations Includes a heading and title.
Drawing/Art
	Not Attempted 0 pts	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done 1 pts	Acceptable; Below Expectations 2 pts	Acceptable; Meets Expectations 3 pts	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectations 4 pts
Topic	Not Attempted Not attempted.	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done Topic is unrelated to competition.	Acceptable; Below Expectations Topic is related to elements of competition.	Acceptable; Meets Expectations Topic centers around the competition.	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectations Topic centers around the competition AND details what it impression it gave the author.
Presentation	Not Attempted Not attempted.	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done Presentation is sloppy and unclear.	Acceptable; Below Expectations Presentation is somewhat neat and clear.	Acceptable; Meets Expectations Presentation is neat and clear.	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectations Presentation is exemplary.
Article/Interpretation
	Not Attempted 0 pts	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done 1 pts	Acceptable; Below Expectations 2 pts	Acceptable; Meets Expectations 3 pts	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectations 4 pts
Article	Not Attempted Not Attempted.	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done Copy was not included in project. Article was unrelated to marching band.	Acceptable; Below Expectations Article was related to marching band, but was not about "the values of competition."	Acceptable; Meets Expectations Article was about "the values of marching band and competition."	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectations N/A
Interpretation/Summary	Not Attempted Not Attempted.	Unacceptable; Must be Re-Done Thoughts were disorganized and unrelated to the article's context.	Acceptable; Below Expectations Thoughts consist mostly of quotations from the article. Very few original perceptions were included.	Acceptable; Meets Expectations Thoughts were appropriately organized. Author's interpretation of the article is clear and supported.	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectations Author's interpretation of the article is extensive. Thoughts are relevant to the experiences of our own band.
Compilation
	Not Attempted 0 pts	Not Acceptable; Must be Re-Done 1 pts	Acceptable; Below Expectations 2 pts	Acceptable; Meets Expectations 3 pts	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectations 4 pts
Organization	Not Attempted Sloppy. Individual components were turned in separately.	Not Acceptable; Must be Re-Done Fairly unneat. Project items stapled to the back of the assignment packet.	Acceptable; Below Expectations Moderately neat. Project components were turned in in a folder or binder, but evidence of effort or organization was missing.	Acceptable; Meets Expectations Very neat. Project assembled in a folder or binder in a logical manner.	Acceptable; Exceeds Expectations Project assembled in an exceptionally clear, organized manner. Project components are neatly labeled.

Keywords:

Band, Marching, Competition

Subjects:

Music

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric