iRubric: Evaluation of Web 2.0 Tools rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Evaluation of Web 2.0 Tools

Participants will demonstrate their ability to evaluate their choice of 3 Web 2.0 tool for use in the classroom according to the rubric.

Rubric Code: B8747C

By munacy

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Computers

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Web 2.0 Technologies
	Exceeds = 4 20 pts	Meets Standards=3 15 pts	Approaching=2 10 pts	Does not meet=1 5 pts
Created a wiki	Exceeds = 4 Demonstrated mastery of critical tasks and created pages labeled references, research articles, resources, and Yodio presentation	Meets Standards=3 Demonstrated mastery of critcal tasks and created 2 or more pages and uploaded final Yodio presentation	Approaching=2 Changes needed because of missing pages and other components of final Yodio presentation	Does not meet=1 Incomplete product with little evidence of mastery of understanding incomplete final yodio project
Graphic Organizer	Exceeds = 4 Demonstrated mastery by clearly and logically utililizing graphic organizer to highlight 5 benefits and challenges of using Web 2.0 technologies	Meets Standards=3 Demonstrated mastery of utilizing graphic organizer to highlight at least 4 benefits and challenges of Web 2.0 technologies.	Approaching=2 Little evidence of mastery utilizing and completing graphic organizer to highlight 3 or fewer benefits and challenges of utilizing Web 2.0 technologies.	Does not meet=1 Incomplete use of graphic organizer and missing benefits and challenges of Web 2.0 technology components.
Created Yodio and uploaded to Wiki	Exceeds = 4 Demonstrated mastery of recording yodio and adding it to photo, as well as uploaded it to wiki or blog	Meets Standards=3 Demonstrated mastery of recording yodio and adding photo to narration.	Approaching=2 Demonstrated mastery of recording yodio.	Does not meet=1 Incomplete assignment
Group Collaboration	Exceeds = 4 Identified, shared and completed group work equally with team members.	Meets Standards=3 Participated and contributed to group work and final Yodio project	Approaching=2 Provided minimal input and failed to meet deadlines and assignment responsibilities	Does not meet=1 Did not participate equally with group activities and rarely provided input and lacked evidence of understanding learning outcomes.