iRubric: Planing, Design, Architecture and Presentation Group Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Planing, Design, Architecture and Presentation Group Rubric

Building Together: Architecture and Design Group Rubric

Architectural model of building

Rubric Code: B2W6B7W

By ESUHSDArtPhoto

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Building Together Group
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Needs Improvement 1 pts
Decision Making	Excellent	Good	Fair	Needs Improvement One person dominates the decision making
Planning and Proportions	Excellent Bibliography and drawing draft planning	Good	Fair	Needs Improvement
Building time Model Construction	Excellent Effort and time spent building	Good	Fair	Needs Improvement
On Task Behavior	Excellent Students exhibit on-task behavior consistently	Good Most students exhibit on-task behavior most of the time	Fair	Needs Improvement
Critique / Presentation	Excellent Group is able to present their building and model to the class. Description of the building clearly indicates there was thought process and collaboration behind the design.	Good Group is able to talk about most of their building design and model. Group is able to describe the thought processes behind the design.	Fair Group is able to talk about some of their building design and model. Group is unable to describe the thought processes behind the design.	Needs Improvement Group is unable to present the model or talk about their building design. Group is not able participate in the critique.
Architectural Cardboard Model	Excellent Model shows the group's effort, time, and thought put into the creation of the project. Students went above and beyond the original project requirements, adding details such as windows, building materials, etc.	Good Group followed directions and created a cardboard model of a building of their design. Model looks finished and structurally sound.	Fair Group built a cardboard model of a building, but with structural problems. Model shows that more time, thought, or effort was needed in the creation of the project.	Needs Improvement Group was not successful in creating a cardboard model of a building.
Collaboration- Social Interaction	Excellent All members of group successfully communicated and worked collaboratively, both online and in person, in order to support individual learning and contribute to the learning of others.	Good All members of group communicated and worked collaboratively, both online and in person.	Fair Some members of group communicated and worked collaboratively, online and/or in person.	Needs Improvement Group members did not successfully communicate and work collaboratively, online and/or in person. Group did not make an effort to collaborate on project.