Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Final Exam Rubric Persuasive Essay
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Final Exam Rubric Persuasive Essay
Final Exam Rubric Persuasive Essay
Write a five-paragraph persuasive argument in which you use what you have learned during this semester on rhetoric and how/why it has changed your communication practices outside of class and within Morton College. Support a claim about the 'link' between rhetoric and your communication/persuasive argumentation development. You must cite at least four examples as evidence and explain why they are relevant to your thesis.
Rubric Code:
AXXAB66
By
vadenbd
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Persuasive Essay
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Claim
Excellent
The claim is clearly discernible and it is stated along with three logical reasons as part of overview. The argument is sound and consistently supported with well-chosen evidence.
Good
The claim takes a clear position. Argument and evidence may at times be strained. One support par. may veer off topic, or examples may be lacking.
Fair
The claim is weak, wordy, and/or garbled. The main
argument and/or evidence is weak or does not always support the claim. Supporting pars. may veer off topic.
Poor
No claim. Argument and evidence do not connect or support one point. All
supporting paragraphs are disconnected.
Organization
Excellent
Essay is focused and organized by design.
Pars. have clear topic/concluding sentences; body paragraphs include counterarguments with refutation & effective transitions.
Good
Essay is organized.
Has a topic and concluding sentences; body paragraphs may include counterarguments and refutation, or not; and/or lack transitions; and/or lack an overall design.
Fair
Some confusion due to lack of organization. Has weak topic and/or concluding sentence; and body paragraphs include weak counterargument and ineffective rebuttal. Transitions are weak or absent.
Poor
No organization.No apparent topic is present, and/or concluding sentence is missing; body paragraphs lack counterarguments and/or rebuttal. No transitions. Discursive.
Analysis
Excellent
Claim is fully developed and supported. Evidence is vivid and relevant. Analysis shows insightful reflection with highly effective use of persuasive strategies.
Good
Claim is well developed and supported with good evidence. Analysis shows understanding with some use of persuasive strategies.
Fair
Claim is not well supported by evidence. Analysis is partly understood and demonstrated; inconsistent persuasive strategies.
Poor
Claim is not supported by evidence or analysis.
Voice & Tone
Excellent
Consistently uses a variety in word choice and sentence structure.
Strong unique voice adds polished style to the writing; tone is consistent with purpose throughout.
Good
Shows some variety in word choice and/or sentence structure.
Uses own voice, but style may be rough. Tone is consistent with purpose, but may include one or two abrupt shifts
Fair
Not enough variety in sentence structure and/or word choice.
Voice and tone are well suited, but do not stand out or are highly inconsistent.
Poor
Sentence structure is repetitive and word choice is basic. Voice is undeveloped and tone is inconsistent.
Citation
Excellent
Sources as solid evidence are cited and applied. All quotes & paraphrases are introduced in essay using title and author of content quoted. Elegant flow and engaging to read.
Good
4-5 sources are present. All quotes & paraphrases introduced using title and author; essay is correctly composed using MLA format.
Fair
3-4 sources are cited but may lack description. Quotes & paraphrases may be introduced using title and/or author, yet essay is not composed correctly in MLA format.
Poor
Fewer than 3 sources are cited. Quotes & paraphrases are not introduced; essay not composed correctly in MLA format.
Mechanics
Excellent
Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation are few and do not interfere with the reader's or audience's understanding.
Good
Semi-frequent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation do not interfere with understanding.
Fair
Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation sometimes interfere with understanding.
Poor
Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation prevent reader from fully understanding the essay.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.