Skip to main content

iRubric: Math Project Final 2014 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Math Project Final 2014 
Rubric Code: AXWX5CC
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Math  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Final Project Spring 2014
  Excellent

20 pts

Good

15 pts

Fair

10 pts

Poor

5 pts

Preparation of Final
33 %
In Class Work Effort

Excellent

Used all time effectively in class and completed work diligently. They collected their data and did a good job of handling the required supplies for an effective project.
Good

Used time effectively, but still social. They collected their data and did a good job, most of the time, handling the required supplies for an effective project.
Fair

Used time somewhat effectively, but was loud and off task. They sometimes did a good job of handling the required supplies and gathering the appropriate data.
Poor

Did not use time effectively in class. Student had little data gathered and often handled supplies inappropriately.
Organization of Information

Excellent

Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which can be clearly followed. We can tell what the project was from the display board and presentation. Math Skills, at least 5, were clearly identified and explained.
Good

Student presents information in a somewhat logical, interesting sequence which can be clearly followed. We can somewhat tell what the project was from the display board and presentation. Math Skills, at least 4, were somewhat identified and explained.
Fair

Student presents information in a somewhat logical, interesting sequence which can be clearly followed. We can somewhat tell what the project was from the display board and presentation. Math Skills, at least 2, were somewhat identified and explained.
Poor

Student presents information in a sequence which could not clearly be followed. We could not tell what the project was from the display board and presentation. Math Skills were not identified and explained.
Vision of Project

Excellent

Student had clear vision of what was required, expected and asked questions if they did not understand. They knew how they were going to put together the information to make an effective display board. Student also brought needed materials when asked the first time.
Good

Student had a semi-clear vision of what was required, expected and sometimes asked questions if they did not understand. They somewhat knew how they were going to put together the information to make an effective display board. Student also brought needed materials when asked after several times.
Fair

Student had a semi-clear vision of what was required, expected and rarely asked questions if they did not understand. They somewhat knew how they were going to put together the information to make an effective display board. Student did not bring needed materials to class when asked after several times.
Poor

Student did not ask questions nor have a clear understanding of what they needed to do. They did not bring in required supplies when asked.
Math Skills Explained

Excellent

All work throughout project is labeled and fully explained, very easy to follow and understand in complete sentences. Work is extremely neat, organized, and easy to follow.
Good

Work throughout the project is labeled and explained, but details are left out. Work is neat, organized, and easy to follow.
Fair

Work throughout the project is only Idea labeled or explained, but not both. Some ideas or details are missing or not shown. Work is shown in the project.
Poor

No Idea labeled or explained.
Problem Solving Skills

Excellent

The student determined and understood the facts of the project, they were able to evaluate the problems and consequences associated with the project and develop solutions to try. They then could develop their own procedure and test it, time allowing.
Good

The student adequately determined and understood the facts of the project, they were able to evaluate the problems and consequences associated with the project They struggled to develop their own procedure for testing.
Fair

The student could somewhat determine and understand the facts of the project, they somewhat could evaluate the problems and consequences associated with the project They struggled to develop their own procedure for testing.
Poor

The student could not determine and understand the facts of the project, they could not evaluate the problems and consequences associated with the project They could not develop their own procedure for testing.
Display Board for Final
33 %
Display Board

Excellent

Creative display board with a variety of materials and high creativity. Incorporates vocabulary and other visuals relating to the Math Concepts of the project.
Good

Display board with materials and some creativity. Incorporates some vocabulary and visuals that relate to the Math Concepts of the project.
Fair

Display board with minimal materials and creativity. Display has title, but little additional visuals relating to topic.
Poor

Bare display board created.
Design

Excellent

Graphics are trimmed or cropped to an appropriate size and interesting
shape and are
arranged well.
Care was taken to balance the
pictures.
Good

Graphics are trimmed or cropped to an appropriate size and
shape and are adequately
arranged.
Care was somewhat taken to balance the
pictures.
Fair

Graphics are somewhat trimmed to an appropriate size and
shape and but are not adequately
arranged.
Care was not taken to balance the
pictures.
Poor

Graphics are not trimmed to an appropriate size and shape and but are not adequately
arranged.
Subject Knowledge

Excellent

Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.
Good

Student is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate.
Fair

Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.
Poor

Student does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about subject.
Graphs

Excellent

Student had both required graphs and they were labeled correctly and clearly explained the project and data.
Both are clear with many details in their graphs.
Good

Student had both required graphs but it was not completely labeled correctly to display gathered data.
Had both graphs and adequately provided many details in their graphs.
Fair

Student used one graph that supported the data gathered during the project but it was not labeled correctly.
They could not correctly display the needed details.
Poor

Student uses no graphs as was instructed.
No understanding of graphs and data is seen.
Presentation of Final
34 %
Math Skills Understood

Excellent

Student excellently communicated the relationship between Math Skills Learned during the semester and the final project. They were able to clearly communicate and display the data using graphs so the audience did not need to see the project and all the data.
Good

Student adequately communicated the relationship between Math Skills Learned during the semester and the final project. They were almost able to clearly communicate and display the data using graphs so the audience did not need to see the project and all the data.
Fair

Student somewhat communicated the relationship between Math Skills Learned during the semester and the final project. They struggled to be able to clearly communicate and display the data using graphs so the audience did not need to see the project and all the data.
Poor

Student did not communicate the relationship between Math Skills Learned during the semester and the final project. They could not clearly communicate and display the data using graphs so the audience did not need to see the project and all the data.
Requirements for Final

Excellent

No math errors are found.
A complete response with a detailed explanation.
Goes beyond the requirements of the problem.
Student completed peer evaluation answering all questions.
Good

No major math errors or serious flaws in reasoning.
Good solid response with clear explanation.
Meets the requirements of the problem.
Student completed peer evaluation answering almost all the questions.
Fair

May be some serious math errors or flaws in reasoning.
Explanation is unclear.
Hardly meets the requirements of the problem.
Student completed peer evaluation answering a few of the questions.
Poor

Major math errors or serious flaws in reasoning.
Misses key points.
Does not meet the requirements of the problem.
Student did not complete and turn in peer evaluations.
Reflection

Excellent

Personal reflection of the semester and learned skills is excellently displayed and explained with an understanding of some math concepts displayed during the entire project..
Good

Personal reflection of the semester and learned skills is adequately displayed and explained with an understanding of some math concepts displayed during the entire project..
Fair

Personal reflection of the semester and learned skills is somewhat displayed and explained with an understanding of some math concepts displayed during the entire project..
Poor

Personal reflection of the semester and learned skills is not displayed and explained. Little understanding of some math concepts is displayed during the entire project.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243