iRubric: rubric for a collaborative wiki project

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

rubric for a collaborative wiki project

This rubric is designed for a collaborative wiki project. In the project, learners are expected to research an assigned computer fundamentals topic on the Internet, choose five facts to change on the topic, and write an article about their assigned topic. After completed, they set up their wiki page, post their article, and invite their peers to visit their website and post their comments by guessing which facts are changed.

Rubric Code: AX2A527

By chelle55

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Computers

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Rubric for a collaborative Wiki pro
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Score (N/A)
Research skills	Poor Learners can research assigned topic on the Internet, however, they identify less than five facts of the topic. Provides only minimal understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.	Fair Learners can research the topic on the Internet, identify 5-9 facts of the topic. Provides a moderate amount of insight, understanding, and reflective thought about the topic.	Good Learners can research the topic on the Internet, identify more than 10 facts of the topic, which could attract their audience. Provides comprehensive insight,understanding, and reflective thought about the topic.	Score
Writing skills	Poor Learners can write an article for the topic, but their writing is less than 100 words. Less than 5 facts are modified. Their writing is not clear, their grammatical and vocaburary errors hinder comprehension. Makes minimal use of headings, fonts, bullet points and white space to enhance visual appeal and creadability.	Fair Learners can write an articles of assigned topic with over 100-200 words. 5 facts are modified. Their writing is very clear, but there is some grammatical and vocabulary mistakes.Makes occasional use of headings, fonts, bullet points and white space to enhance the content’s visual appeal and increase readability.	Good Learners can write an articles of assigned topic with over 100-200 words.10 out of 5 facts are modified. Their writing is very clear, use appropriate grammar and words. Makes frequent and effective use of headings, fonts, bullet points and white space to enhance the content’s visual appeal and increase readability.	Score
Visuals	Poor Learners can incorporate images, but the images are not relevant to the topic. Includes links to websites or documents, which add little value to the information presented. Connects to many outdated resources, which appear to have only a minimal connection to the topic. Acknowledges only a few multimedia and image sources and uses incomplete captions or annotations.	Fair Learners can incorporate images, which is relevant to their topic, but quality of images is not good; not clear or bad angle. Includes links to websites or documents, but not all links enhance the information presented. Connects to resources, which are usually relevant and up-to-date. Acknowledges most image and multimedia sources with captions or annotations.	Good Learners can incorporate images, which is relevant to their topic, and enhance comprehension of their readers. Includes links to websites or documents that enhance the information presented. Connects to relevant, up-to-date resources. Acknowledges all image and multimedia sources with captions or annotations.	Score
Setting up wiki skills	Poor Learners set up wiki only for their guests after the due. Their page set up has problems, their guests cannot enroll in their pages. Occasionally meets goals and deadlines.	Fair Learners can set up wiki only for their guests, and post their article by due. But their labels for the pages is not clear and difficult to nagivate. Usually meets goals and deadlines.	Good Learners can set up wiki only for their guests, and post their article by due. They use effective labels so that their guests can easily nagivate. Meets all goalsand deadlines.	Score
Comment skills	Poor Learners cannot find out how to use comment functions in wiki, or did not respond to their peer's article. Exhibits a minimal knowledge of wiki etiquette and often fails to respect the work of others.	Fair Learners can use comment functions in wiki, and respond to their peers. They compare their peer's article and orignal article, and identify less than 5 changed facts, and respond to the writer. Exhibits appropriate wiki etiquette most of the time and generally respects the work of others.	Good Learners can use comment functions in wiki, and respond to their peers. They compare their peer's article and orignal article, and identify 5 changed facts, and respond to the writer. Exhibits appropriate wiki etiquette when editing and respects the work of others.	Score
Group/partner Collaboration	Poor Provides minimal assistance to group members in researching, writing and editing, and does not follow through with all tasks. Presents information in a style that is often inappropriate for the intended audience.	Fair Assists group members with most of the researching, writing and editing. Presents information in a style that is generally appropriate for the intended audience.	Good Contributes equally with other group members in researching, writing, and editing. Presents information in a style that is appealing and appropriate for the intended audience.	Score
Final Score	Poor	Fair	Good	Score Total Score:

Keywords:

Wiki project, collabotative, rubric, language learners

Subjects:

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric