Skip to main content
iRubric: CWHP NNP Presentation rubric

iRubric: CWHP NNP Presentation rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
CWHP NNP Presentation 
CWHP Terrorism Presentation
Rubric Code: AX26WW2
By senor_oro
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric NNP
Enter rubric description
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Required Elements

It is the year 2020 and five countries are threatening to resign from the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty so they can develop nuclear weapons. Create a dramatic presentation in which people (citizens, nuclear specialists, government leaders, humanitarian aid workers, etc.) who have been involved in past nuclear accidents negotiate with one of the five countries (Country X) to dissuade it from developing weapons.
Excellent

•Set in future and follows scenario laid out in task description
• Makes use of 3 or more of the following: costumes, props, sound effects, backdrops, emotion, dramatic gesture.
• Makes use of personal testimony w/at least 5 pieces of specific information about nuclear non-proliferation.
• Includes multiple perspectives (citizens, government leaders, humanitarian aid workers, nuclear specialists.)
• Addresses how nuclear proliferation can be prevented, stabilized, and m
Good

•Set in future and mostly follows scenario laid out in task description
• Makes use of 2 or more of the following: costumes, props, sound effects, backdrops, emotion, dramatic gesture.
• Makes use of personal testimony w/at least 3 pieces of specific information.
• Includes at least 2 perspectives.
• Partially addresses how nuclear proliferation can be prevented, stabilized, and managed.
Fair

•Set in future but doesnt follow scenario laid out in task description
• Makes use of at least 1 of the following: costumes, props, sound effects, backdrops, emotion, dramatic gesture.
• Makes use of personal testimony w/at least 3 pieces of specific information.
• Includes only one perspective.
• Attempts to address nuclear proliferation in a unsatisfactory way
Poor

•Not set in future and fails to follow scenario laid out in task description
• Doesn't make use of any of the following:costumes, props, sound effects, backdrops, emotion, dramatic gesture.
• Makes use of personal testimony w/at least 1 pieces of specific information.
• Includes only one perspective.
• Does not address nuclear proliferation in a unsatisfactory way
Delivery

Excellent

-Good posture
-Eye contact with the audience most of the time
-Appropriate gesture and expression
-Deliverance with confidence
-Full group participation
Good

-Good posture
-Frequent eye contact with the audience
-Appropriate gesture and expression
-Almost full group particiapation
Fair

-Intermittent good posture
-Occasional eye contact with the audience
-Appropriate gesture and expression
-Partial group presentation
Poor

-Poor posture
-Seldom eye contact with the audience
-Not enough or too much gesture and expression
-One person presentation.
Organization

Excellent

-Specific introduction and conclusion
-Sequenced material within the body
-Cohesive presentation content
Good

-Specific introduction and conclusion
-Sequenced material within the body
-Cohesive presentation content
Fair

-Specific introduction and conclusion
-Sequenced material within the body is inconsistent
Poor

-Specific introduction and conclusion
-No sequence in material
Subject Knowledge

Excellent

Group members demonstrate full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.
Good

Group members are at ease with expected answers to all questions, but members may fail to elaborate.
Fair

Group members are uncomfortable with information and members are able to answer only rudimentary questions.
Poor

Group members do not have grasp of information; members of group cannot answer questions about subject.
Elocution

Excellent

Group members use clear voices and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation.
Good

Group member's voices are clear. and they pronounce most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation.
Fair

Group member's voices are low and they incorrectly pronounce terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.
Poor

Group Members mumble, incorrectly pronounce terms, and speak too quietly for students in the back of class to hear.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16