- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: European Expansion Timeline rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
European Expansion Timeline This is the grading rubric that students will be graded on in regards to the timeline they construct in class. Rubric Code: AB6769 By zawample Draft Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8

European Expansion Rubric
	Needs Improvement 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Information	Needs Improvement Information is not present at all. The information does not pertain to the European Expansion at all and has a complete lack of detail.	Fair Information is not clearly presented, it is present but difficult to find. The information loosely pertains to the European Expansion but goes in little to no depth.	Good Information is clearly presented, either in the notes section or plainly on the timeline. The information pertains to the European Expansion, though it does not go into much depth or detail.	Excellent Information is clearly presented, either in the notes section or plainly on the timeline. The information pertains to the European Expansion, and goes into depth.
Accuracy	Needs Improvement Material presented is inaccurate. Major dating errors are present in the student's timeline. The student's timeline gives the wrong dates for a number of events, which blurs the meaning of the project.	Fair Material presented is slightly accurate. There are some minor errors, but also major errors that could confuse the reader. Overall, the student's timeline has some major dating errors that should be fixed.	Good Material presented is mostly accurate. There are some minor errors though they are negligible at worst. Overall, the student's timeline has few to no error dating errors.	Excellent Material presented is completely and historically accurate. There are no dating errors in the student's timeline.
Grammar	Needs Improvement The student's timeline and notes are full of grammatical errors. The student should revise their work more thoroughly next time they submit the timeline.	Fair The student's timeline has a several major grammatical errors and a few minor grammatical errors. The student should review their work carefully to understand the errors they made.	Good The student's timeline has few to no grammatical errors in their timeline. Overall, the meaning of the timeline and the notes are not lost in the student's writing.	Excellent The student's timeline has no grammatical errors in their timeline. Overall, the student's timeline could be presented to any audience with perfect clarity.