Skip to main content

iRubric: Chapter Summary and Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Chapter Summary and Presentation Rubric HTEF Chapter Summary and Presentation Rubric Rubric Code: A9338C By DJKirk Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Chapter Written Summary
	Unacceptable/Absent 1 pts	Limited/Emerging 2 pts	Proficient 3 pts	Advanced 4 pts
Summary Length	Unacceptable/Absent Summary was under 250 words	Limited/Emerging Summary was between 250 and 349 words or over 550 words	Proficient Summary was either between 350 and 399 words or between 501 and 550 words	Advanced Summary was 400-500 words in length
Spelling/Punctuation/Grammar	Unacceptable/Absent The summary contains more than 5 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors	Limited/Emerging The summary contains 3-5 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors	Proficient The summary contains 1-2 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors	Advanced The summary contains no spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors
Identification of Main Points	Unacceptable/Absent No grasp of any of the main points intended by the author	Limited/Emerging Only 1-2 main points in the text accurately identified and explained	Proficient 3 main points accurately identified and briefly summarized from the text	Advanced At least 4 main points identified and briefly summarized from the text
Identification of Questions	Unacceptable/Absent Does not include insightful questions to be discusses in class	Limited/Emerging Includes only 1-2 insighful questions that are poorly worded and/or lack depth of insight	Proficient Includes 3 questions from the text that are poorly worded and/or lack depth of insight	Advanced Includes at least 3 insigtful questions from the text to be used in class discussion
Student Evaluation of the Chapter	Unacceptable/Absent Evaluation is not fluid and demonstrates no understanding of the author's perspective	Limited/Emerging Evalutation is mostly fluid and adequately explained, but demonstrates a lack of understanding of the author's overall perspective	Proficient Evaluation is fluid, but demonstrates a lack of understanding ofat least one of the author's points	Advanced Evaluation is fluid, thorough, and demonstrates that the student clearly understand the author's perspective
Christian Theology & History	Unacceptable/Absent The student demonstrates almost no critical thinking skills regarding the integration of Christian theology and history	Limited/Emerging Student demonstrates emerging but limited critical thinking skills regarding the integration of Christian theology and history	Proficient Student demonstrates proficient critical thinking skills through integration of Christian theology and worldview as it relates to history	Advanced Student demonstrates advanced critical thinking skills thorugh integration of Christian theology and worldview as it relates to history
Evaluation of Class Discussion
	Unacceptable/Absent 1 pts	Limited/Emerging 2 pts	Proficient 3 pts	Advanced 4 pts
Length of Discussion	Unacceptable/Absent Discussion Lasted Less than 15 Minutes	Limited/Emerging Discussion Ranged from 15-20 Minutes	Proficient Discussion ranged from 20-25 Minutes	Advanced Discussion ran for 25+ Minutes
Student Engagement	Unacceptable/Absent Students were not at all engaged in the class dialogue	Limited/Emerging Students were only occasionally engaged in the conversation	Proficient Students were mostly engaged in the conversation, though the dialogue tended to lag at times	Advanced The presenter kept most students actively engaged in the conversation using insightful and provoking comments and questions
Communication	Unacceptable/Absent Presenter lacked confidence and did not effectively guide the conversation	Limited/Emerging Presenter only occasionally demonstrated confidence and struggled to communicate and guide the conversation	Proficient Presenter demonstrated confidence and communicated clearly for the most part, but occasionally struggled to effectively guide the conversation	Advanced Presenter demonstrated confidence and communicated with clear articulation, effectively guiding the class through the conversation
Collaboration	Unacceptable/Absent Partners do not work well together, do not share responsibility to communicate, and cause ensuing confusion for the rest of the class	Limited/Emerging Partners do not work together very well and do not seem to be on the same page in their efforts to guide the conversation	Proficient Partners work together well for the most part to effectively guide the conversation, though one partner tends to dominate the conversation	Advanced Partners work together well to effectively guide the conversation and share the responsibility of communicating equally
Continuity with Written Summary	Unacceptable/Absent The class discussion was completely unrelated and inconsistent with the written summary	Limited/Emerging Class discussion had very little to do with the written summary and/or was mostly inconsistent with the content of the summary	Proficient Class discussion was clearly linked to the written summary, though the presenter displayed some inconsistencies in communication	Advanced Class discussion was clearly linked to and consistent with the ideas presented in the written summary
Critical Thinking	Unacceptable/Absent Presenter demonstrated no understanding of or ability to evaluate the chapter	Limited/Emerging Presenter verbally demonstrated accurate understanding, analysis, and evaluation of only a limited portion of the chapter	Proficient Presenter verbally demonstrated an understanding, analysis, and evalution of most of the content of the chapter	Advanced Presenter verbally demonstrated clear and accurate understanding, analysis, and evaluation of the content of the chapter
Connecting Christian Theo & Hist	Unacceptable/Absent The student demonstrates no understanding of the relationship between Christian Theology and History, nor its relevance today	Limited/Emerging The student demonstrates only a vague understanding of the relationship between Christian Theology and History and does not show its relevance	Proficient The student demonstrates an understanding of the relationship between Christian theology and history, but fails to show its relevance for us today	Advanced The student demonstrates a clear understanding of the relationship between Christian theology and history, and its relavance for us today

Subjects:

History

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More History rubrics

More Writing rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178