iRubric: VCE Geog Unit 2 -Change in Vietnam futures wheel rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

VCE Geog Unit 2 -Change in Vietnam futures wheel

VCE Geog Unit 1 - Coastal impacts futures wheel

Rubric Code: A5CW9X

By evieo8

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Geography

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Change in Vietnam Futures Wheel
	High Distinction (N/A)	Distinction (N/A)	Credit (N/A)	Pass (N/A)	Low Pass (N/A)	Not shown 0 pts
Human impact rural/urban (10)	High Distinction 10 9 The information is accurate and presents a complete picture of the positive and negative impacts of the proposal. Impacts show sophisticated understanding of human/development processes (health, social, cultural economic, built). More than one level of impact is shown consistently.	Distinction 8 The impacts presented are accurate and cover the main consequences of the proposal. At least 7 impacts are identified. Impacts show very good variety and understanding. More than one level of impacts is shown at times.	Credit 7 The impact are accurate and cover most of the major impacts. At least 5 impacts are identified. Impacts show good understanding of human/ development processes. Only one level of impacts shown. More variety could be provided.	Pass 6 -5 The impacts presented are accurate but do not cover a majority of main issues. 3 - 4 impacts given. Only one level of impacts shown. Variety and type show a basic understanding of human processes and development	Low Pass 4 - 1 The impacts presented are inaccurate, rudimentary or difficult to understand. Less than 3 impacts given.	Not shown
Natural Impacts (10)	High Distinction 10 9 The information is accurate and presents a complete picture of the positive and negative impacts of the proposal on the natural environment Impacts show sophisticated understanding of interactions between natural processes and human development. More than one level of impact is shown consistently.	Distinction 8 The impacts presented are accurate and cover the main impacts. At least 7 impacts are identified. Impacts show very good variety and understanding. More than one level of impacts is shown at times.	Credit 7 The impact are accurate and cover most of the major impacts. At least 5 impacts are identified. Impacts show good understanding of natural processes and human development. Only one level of impacts shown. More variety could be provided.	Pass 6-5 The impacts presented are accurate but do not cover a majority of main issues. 3 - 4 impacts given. Only one level of impacts shown. Variety and type show a basic understanding of interactions between natural processes and human development	Low Pass 4-1 The impacts presented are inaccurate, rudimentary or difficult to understand. Less than 3 impacts given.	Not shown
Linkages (10)	High Distinction Linkages are thorough logical, accurate and either self explanatory or detailed with words. Linkages show sophisticated understanding of human and natural processes that impact on development	Distinction 8 Linkages are logical, accurate however could be outlined in more detail. Linkages show a very good understanding of people/environment interactions. Attempts are made to detail the relationships between human and natural environment	Credit 7 Some linkages are displayed which show a good understanding of processes - others linkages are missing or not well detailed. Relationships between human development and natural processes are mentioned but not detailed	Pass 6-5 Linkages show a basic understanding of human development interactions with the natural environment . More detail and connections required.	Low Pass 4-1 The linkages presented are inaccurate, rudimentary or difficult to understand	Not shown
PRESENTATION (5)	High Distinction 5 The wheel is neat and clear. Layout is logical with like concepts positioned in groups. There are no spelling errors. It is presented with excellent detail, colour, line work and creativity. Extra effort has been made with presentation.	Distinction 4 The wheel is neat and clear. Layout is logical with like concepts positioned in groups. Some spelling errors. It is presented with very good detail and line work.	Credit 3.5 The wheel is neat and clear. The positioning of like concepts could be improved. Some spelling errors. It is presented with good detail and line work.	Pass 2.5 The wheel is clear however could be presented more neatly. Little attempt has been made to group like concepts. Line work and detail show a basic level of skill. Spelling errors	Low Pass 2 Layout at times is unclear or confusing. Presentation requires substantial improvement. Line work is presented poorly. Many spelling errors	Not shown

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric