iRubric: "Web 2.0 tools for teaching" 2009 awards rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

"Web 2.0 tools for teaching" 2009 awards

This rubric will be used to asset merits of proposals submitted for evaluation to CETL's "Web 2.0 tools for teaching" 2009 awards.

Rubric Code: A3W866

By algalvis50

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate, Post Graduate

ICTE to address learning needs ICTE = Information and Communication Technologies for Education
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 5 pts
Time delivered When the proposal was submitted to galvisal@wssu.edu	Poor It was submitted after 5pm EST, July 19, 2009	Fair It was submitted after 5pm EST, July 17, 209, not later than 5pm EST, July 19, 2009	Good It was submitted not later than 5pm EST, July 17, 2009.
Scope and rationale Why 3 or more ICTE selected for this proposal could add value to the course	Poor Less than three educational needs were identified that could be reduced with ICTE, and/or the explanation on how selected ICTE could allow narrowing the gap is poor	Fair The explanation on how selected ICTE could allow narrowing three educational gaps does not demonstrate understanding of selected ICTE potential.	Good At least three educational needs that could be reduced with ICTE are identified, and there is a valid explanation on how selected ICTE could allow narrowing the gap.
Course evaluation weights How the use of selected ICTE will impact final grade	Poor Activities proposed with selected ICTE are not valued in the assessment process	Fair Activities proposed with selected ICTE are given a value that does not reflect their importance in the assessment process	Good Activities proposed with selected ICTE are given a value that reflects their importance in the assessment process
Technology requirements Content of course program technology requirements	Poor Selected ICTE and required plug ins are not mentioned in course technology requirements	Fair Selected ICTE and required plug ins are mentioned in course technology requirements, without URLs to download software (if needed) / to access tutorial information.	Good Selected ICTE and required plug ins are mentioned in course technology requirements, including URLs to download software (if needed) and to access tutorial information.
Rubrics for ICTE activities How to assess activities supported with ICTE	Poor Rubrics for students to self-assess their educational use of selected ICTE are not provided.	Fair Rubrics for students to self-assess their educational use of selected ICTE are provided, but not per type of technology-enhanced activity.	Good Rubrics for students to self-assess their educational use of selected ICTE are provided, one per type of technology-enhanced activity.