Skip to main content

iRubric: ENG111 Phase 3 IP rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
ENG111 Phase 3 IP 
Rubric Code: A3W493
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric ENG111 Phase 3 IP
1 % Touchstone Project
  Excellent (90-100)

Meets and excedes project expectations

20 pts

Good (80-89)

Strongly meets project expectations

20 pts

Average (70-79)

Meets project expectations

20 pts

Poor (60-69)

Does not meet project expectations

20 pts

Incomplete (0-59)

Is missing or incomplete

20 pts

Problem Analysis

Identifies and isolates important facts (What do I know?)

Excellent (90-100)

Demonstrates the ability to distinquish fact from opinion consistently; prefers fact-based analysis
Good (80-89)

Demonstrates the ability to destinguish fact from opinion in most cases; prefers fact-based analysis
Average (70-79)

Demonstrates the ability to distinguish fact from opinion in some cases; confuses the two in others.
Poor (60-69)

Does not demonstrate the ability to distinguish fact from opinion; intermixes both consistently.
Incomplete (0-59)

N/A
Problem Identity

Asks relevant questions (What do I need to know?)

Excellent (90-100)

Demonstrates depth of thought with analytical, higher-level questions
Good (80-89)

Often demonstrates depth of thought with analytical, higher-level questions
Average (70-79)

Sometimes demonstrates depth of thought with analytical, higher-level questions
Poor (60-69)

Rarely demonstrates depth of thought with analytical, higher-level questions
Incomplete (0-59)

N/A
Problem Context

Identifies stakeholders and other interested parties

Excellent (90-100)

Distinguishes between major and minor problems; identifies direct and indirect stakeholders
Good (80-89)

Often distinguishes between major and minor problems; identifies many of the direct and indirect stakeholders
Average (70-79)

Sometimes distinguishes between major and minor problems; inconsistently identifies direct and indirect stakeholders
Poor (60-69)

Rarely distinguishes between major and minor problems; never identifies direct and indirect stakeholders
Incomplete (0-59)

N/A
Problem Articulation

Generates keywords and queries for research

Excellent (90-100)

Identifies keywords and queries that fit across multiple categories
Good (80-89)

Organizes keywords and queries into appropriate categories
Average (70-79)

Sometimes organizes keywords and queries into categories
Poor (60-69)

Rarely organizes keywords and queries into categories
Incomplete (0-59)

N/A
Research Efficiency

Chooses quality information from reliable sources

Excellent (90-100)

Gathers reliable and and wide-ranging information from sources beyond those provided
Good (80-89)

Gathers reliable information from provided sources and from beyond in cases
Average (70-79)

Gathers information from provided sources
Poor (60-69)

Gathers little reliable information from too few soures
Incomplete (0-59)

N/A
Research Synthesis

Organizes collected research into an effective presentation

Excellent (90-100)

Summarizes information from many sources; presentation is concise accurate, and insightful.
Good (80-89)

Organizes information to clearly present answers to research question(s)
Average (70-79)

Sometimes organizes information to clearly present answers to research question(s)
Poor (60-69)

Does not organize information to clearly present answers to research question(s).
Incomplete (0-59)

N/A
Offers Multiple Solutions

Develops multiple solutions and considers strengths and weaknesses of each choice

Excellent (90-100)

Offers multiple solutions grounded on advantages and disadvantages and stakeholder interests.
Good (80-89)

Develops two or more solutions to the major problem(s)
Average (70-79)

Develops a solution proposal to the major problem(s)
Poor (60-69)

Develops or proposes no realistic solution to the major problem(s)
Incomplete (0-59)

N/A
Call to Act

Generates a specific call to action that is used to conclude the essay

Excellent (90-100)

Selects a solution based both ethics and risks/benefits to multiple stakeholders
Good (80-89)

Selects and supports a course of action based on ethics OR risks/benefits to one stakeholder
Average (70-79)

Selects a course of action based on ethics or risks/benefits to one stakeholder but does not justify choice
Poor (60-69)

Offers no specific course of action and considers neither ethical nor stakeholder considersations
Incomplete (0-59)




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n112