Skip to main content

iRubric: Fiction Analysis rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Fiction Analysis 
Rubric Code: A38767
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
 

1 pts


2 pts


3 pts


4 pts


5 pts

Introduction

1

Intro. is empty of meaning. Thesis may not be evident or clear. May forget the title and author. No thesis or poorly written thesis.
2

The introduction states the main idea, but doesn't preview the paper or isn't interesting. Weaker thesis present.
3

Introduction is adequate and presents thesis. Appropriately introduces the author and work. Clear (but maybe boring) thesis.
4

Introduction clearly sttes the main idea and previews the structure of the paper, but isn't as interesting as possible. Clear and engaging thesis.
5

Introduction is powerful and insightful and presents the thesis in a compelling way, previewing the essay structurally. Beautiful thesis
Topic Sentences/Unity

1

Not present or poorly worded topic sentences
2

Topic sentences present but do not tie to the thesis strongly enough
3

Topic sentences are relevant but leave several key words/points undiscussed
4

Topic sentences are relevant and clear
5

Topic sentences masterfully weave the key words from the thesis as they unfold throughout the paper
Support/Content

1

There is little or no support. The writer seems to ramble.
2

There is some support which vaguely relate to the topic sentences/thesis.
3

Support is mostly paraphrase than direct. Some quoted passages may be too long or too short, not adequately filling their responsibilities.
4

Support is present, somewhat detailed--but may be embedded awkwardl. Level of support may vary from paragraph to paragraph.
5

Support is detailed, specific, and embedded. Level of support is consistent throughout essay.
Elaboration/Discussion

1

Little or no relevant discussion of ideas/ Misreading or misunderstanding of the piece
2

Some discussion of ideas, more focused on "what" instead of "why"
3

Relevant discussion, may be simplistic and inconsistent from paragraph to paragraph
4

Relevant telling gives quality ideas that go beyond the predictable or obvious
5

Discussion acknowledges complexities of the piece, reveals a sophisticated understanding of the passage
Transitions (Fluency)

1

Ideas do not link well
2

Some evidence of transitions and repeated key words, but some connections may still be fuzzy
3

Clear effort with transition, but there is little variety
4

A variety of sentence links: repeated key words and standard transition words, phrases
5

A sophisticated weaving of ideas is present using organization, repeated key words, and transitions
Gram/Spell/Cap/Punct

1

Numerous errors distract the reader...may be major or minor
2

An effort in editing is clear, but there are still some obvious errors...mostly minor
3

No major errors, titles are punctuated correctly
May be one or two punctuation errors
4

Clean paper...
5

Squeaky clean paper
Conclusion

1

No conclusion or one that is empty of meaning
2

Attempt at a conclusion, but the connection to the thesis may not be understood
3

Conclusion brings essay to a close, but not powerfully or memorably
4

Conclusion ties paper well, reflects on thesis, and is satisfying
5

Conclusion is graceful, employing a "master" technique which leads to poweful understanding




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243