- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Culture of Pedagogy screencast rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Culture of Pedagogy screencast rubric Culture of Pedagogy screencast rubric - Kayla Anderson Rubric Code: A2357X5 By Kaylaanderson11 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Reflection Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Culture of Pedagogy screencast rubric
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Video/screencast	Poor Video/screencast was less than a minute or exceed 10 minutes. Could not hear student in the video or had no voice over. Student read word for word off the presentation.	Fair Video/screencast was a few minutes off targeted time. Voice was hard to hear. Student relied heavily on the words of their presentations and not from their own mind.	Good Video/screencast was just shy or just over 6 minutes. Voice was mostly clear, with a few stutters. Student spoke mostly from their own knowledge, but used the presentation occasionally.	Excellent Video/screencast was 3-6 minutes long. Voice was clear with minimal stutters. Student was not just reading information off the screen.
Information presented	Poor Information includes 1/3 of: one k-3 relevant technology tool/app tip from the podcast, one 4-12 technology tool/app tip from the podcast, and how the screencast relates to or improves access to the human right selected. Descriptions and details are limited.	Fair Information includes 2/3 of: one k-3 relevant technology tool/app tip from the podcast, one 4-12 technology tool/app tip from the podcast, and how the screencast relates to or improves access to the human right selected. Limited details are present.	Good Information included one k-3 relevant technology tool/app tip from the podcast, one 4-12 technology tool/app tip from the podcast, and how the screencast relates to or improves access to the human right selected.	Excellent Information included one k-3 relevant technology tool/app tip from the podcast in detail, one 4-12 technology tool/app tip from the podcast in detail, and how the screencast relates to or improves access to the human right selected. It is explained in detail on the presentation.
Overall presentation	Poor Presentation was poorly crafted. Little effort was put in. There is missing information and no/poor audio. No details are present.	Fair Presentation was choppy with minimal details. Student attempted to hit all required questions.	Good Presentation was creative, full of information and evidence the student listened to the podcast while connecting it to human rights article.	Excellent Presentation was clean and creative, full of information, detail. and evidence the student listened to the podcast while connecting it to human rights article.