Skip to main content
iRubric: News Broadcast rubric

iRubric: News Broadcast rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
News Broadcast 
Working in groups of two, create a television news video. Include local, national, and international news, science /technology, weather, sports, food or celebrity interview from a French-speaking country, and a commercial to the show. The team may produce the news inside a studio or with reporters.
Rubric Code: A22CCC7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Video
News Broadcast Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Organization
4 pts

Poor

Audience cannot understand presentation because only one or two of the 5W's (What, Where, Who, When, Why, possibly How) are not answered. There is no sequence of information.
Fair

Audience has difficulty following presentation because only three or less of the 5W's (What, Where, Who, When, Why, possibly How) are not answered.because student jumps around.
Good

Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow. Four of the 5W's (What, Where, Who, When, Why, possibly How) are answered.
Excellent

Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.All of the 5W's (What, Where, Who, When, Why, possibly How) are answered.
Content and Culture
4 pts

Poor

Content is weak. Facts are inaccurate. Student should have researched more.
Fair

Student is uncomfortable/unsure with information.
Good

Student is at ease with content and has an easy flow within the message, conveying correct information.
Excellent

Student demonstrates full knowledge of the product and engages the audience with enthusiasm.
Style and Delivery
4 pts

Poor

Speaker did not speak to the audience/camera and read presentation from paper. Poorly timed. Appears to have not practiced.
Fair

Audience could see and hear most of presentation. Speaker seems uncertain of him/her self.
Good

Audience could see and hear speaker clearly, good use of verbal intonation is used.
Excellent

Audience could see & hear speakers clearly. Speaker uses pauses and verbal intonation that work effectively.
Clarity and Pronounciation
8 pts

Poor

Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for viewing audience to hear.
Fair

Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing.
Good

Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear with little effort.
Excellent

Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms. Student is enthusiastic. All viewing audience can hear without effort.
Grammar/spelling
8 pts

Includes punctuation.

Poor

There were numerous errors that made it difficult to understand (8-10)
Fair

There were many grammar / spelling errors (5-7)
Good

There were few grammar / spelling errors (3-4)
Excellent

There were hardly any grammar / spelling errors (1-2).
Visual
4 pts

Poor

No backgrounds, images, props, costume are used to support presentation.
Fair

Very few backgrounds, images, props, costume are used to support presentation.
Good

Backgrounds, images, props, costume are used to improve presentation.
Excellent

Well-selected backgrounds, images, props, costume aid to support presentation.
Length
4 pts

Poor

1 min
Fair

2 mins
Good

3 mins
Excellent

4 mins
Deadline
4 pts

le 15 novembre, 2023

Poor

The project was turned in the next day after school began
Fair

The project was turned in the next day before school began.
Good

The video or skit was completed later in the day that it was due.
Excellent

The video or skit was ready to be presented the day it was due.
Teamwork
8 pts

Did each member play a significant role in the production of the film and equally contribute? All on camera!

Poor

Not all members contributed to the segment, one or more of the project members contributed almost nothing to the production, or lines were distributed unfairly amongst team members. Only 1-2 lines spoken from each team member.
Fair

All members at least contributed something. Some members are far less prominent in the segment and video than others. Only 3-5 lines spoken from each team member.
Good

All members contributed to the segment, but some members did not play as significant a role in the production as a whole. Only 6-7 lines spoken from each team member.
Excellent

All members contributed an equal significant role to the segment. A whole 8 lines spoken from each team member.
Script
8 pts

Le 13 novembre, 2023

Poor

Only half of a script turned in.
Fair

Only one script turned in.
Good

Only one and a half scripts turned in.
Excellent

Both script turned in.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98