- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Criterion D Writing - ELL rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Criterion D Writing - ELL Rubric Code: V226C53 By adriansped Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 6-8

Enter rubric title
	1-2 2 pts	3-4 4 pts	5-6 6 pts	7-8 8 pts
Enter title	1-2 Did not use specific and/or technical vocabulary	3-4 Used some specific and/or technical vocabulary	5-6 Specific and technical vocabulary were used, but with a few errors	7-8 Specific and technical vocabulary strengthened the meaning and purpose of the essay
Enter title	1-2 Sentences are too simple; many errors in sentence structure; did not paraphrase or use the text source	3-4 Used a variety of sentence structures with many errors; did not paraphrase or use the text source correctly	5-6 Used a variety of sentence structures with few errors; paraphrased and used the text source correctly	7-8 used a variety of extended sentence structures correctly, sufficient and appropriate details; all sources are paraphrased and used correctly using MLA or in-text
Enter title	1-2 Details are not in an expected or logical order, making the essay very confusing	3-4 Organizes information in a recognizable format using a range of basic cohesive devices; a few details are not in an expected or logical order, the essay a little confusing	5-6 Most parts of the essay are presented in a logical order that makes it easy to follow the author's train of thought	7-8 The whole essay is written in a logical order that makes it easy and interesting to read
Enter Title	1-2 Writing shows little understanding of the task/prompt; most directions are not followed No supporting evidence presented	3-4 Writing shows some understanding of the task/prompt; a few directions are not followed Some appropriate evidence presented	5-6 Information shows a good understanding of the task/prompt; all directions are followed Sufficient evidence presented	7-8 Writing shows an excellent understanding of the task/prompt; all directions are followed Strong evidence presented