Skip to main content
iRubric: SBAC Argumentative Writing Rubric

iRubric: SBAC Argumentative Writing Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
SBAC Argumentative Writing Rubric 
SBAC Argumentative Writing Rubric
Rubric Code: UX58X57
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric SBAC Argument
LOTF Argument Essay: Human Nature: Good or Evil?
  4

10 pts

3

8.5 pts

2

7.5 pts

1

6 pts

Purpose & Organization

4

The response has a clear and effective organizational structure, creating a sense of unity and completeness. The response is fully sustained and consistently and purposefully focused:
--thesis is clearly stated & focus is strongly maintained for the PATT
--logical progression of ideas from beginning to end; strong connections between ideas with some syntactic variety
3

The response has an evident organizational structure and a sense of completeness, though some ideas may be loosely connected.The response is adequately sustained and generally focused:
--thesis is clear, and the focus is mostly maintained for the PATT
--adequate progression of ideas from beginning to end; adequate connections between ideas
2

The response has an inconsistent organizational structure, and flaws are evident. The response is somewhat sustained and may have a minor drift in focus:
--thesis may be somewhat unclear, or the focus may be insufficiently sustained for the PATT
--uneven progression of ideas from beginning to end; inconsistent or unclear connections among ideas
1

The response has little or no discernible organizational structure. The response may be related to the thesis but may provide little or no focus:
--thesis may be confusing or ambiguous; response may be too brief or the focus may drift from the PATT
--frequent extraneous ideas may intrude; ideas may have an unclear progression
Evidence & Elaboration

4

The response provides thorough and convincing support/evidence for the thesis that includes the effective use of a source (facts, details) and personal experience. The response clearly and effectively expresses ideas, using precise language.
3

The response provides adequate support/evidence for the thesis that includes the use of a source (facts, details) and personal experience. The response adequately expresses ideas, employing a mix of precise with more general language.
2

The response provides uneven, cursory support/evidence for the thesis that includes partial or uneven use of a source (facts, details) or personal experience; may consist primarily of source summary or emotional appeal. The response achieves little depth, using simplistic language.
1

The response provides minimal support/evidence for the thesis that includes little or no use of a source (facts, details) nor personal experience. Emotional appeal may dominate, rather than evidence. The response's expression of ideas is vague, lacks clarity, or is confusing.
Conventions

4

The response demonstrates a strong command of conventions:
--few, if any, errors in usage and sentence formation
--effective and consistent use of punctuation, capitalization, and spelling
3

The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions:
--some errors in usage and sentence formation, but no systematic pattern of errors is displayed
--adequate use of punctuation, capitalization, and spelling
2

The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions:
--limited use of correect sentence formation
--inconsistent use of correct punctuation, capitalization, and spelling
1

The response demonstrates a lack of command of conventions:
--errors are frequent and severe; meaning is often obscured
Picture & Formatting

4

Picture visually depicts the argument and is closed off with symbols between prompt and text. Perfect formatting (fonts, spacing, margins, heading, titles, prompt).
3

Picture is somewhat connected to the argument or is incorrectly closed off with/without symbols. One or two mistakes in formatting (fonts, spacing, margins, heading, titles, prompt).
2

No discernible connection between picture and argument. Three mistakes in formatting (fonts, spacing, margins, heading, titles, prompt).
1

No picture, major formatting errors. It is clear that you did not even pretend to read the directions, nor did you pay attention in class.



Keywords:
  • SBAC, Argument

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98