Skip to main content
iRubric: Progress Report rubric

iRubric: Progress Report rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Progress Report 
This is to keep you on task as you move through the group and individual tasks towards your major White Paper assignment.
Rubric Code: SXB47B3
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Progress Report
Enter rubric description
  Excellent

5 pts

Satisfactory

3 pts

Needs Improvement

2 pts

Unsatisfactory

1 pts

Teamwork

How well is your team working together?
Is it productive?

Excellent

The team works above average to problem solve. They listen and accept others opinions. Each member stays with the group daily and stays focused.
Satisfactory

The team works well together to problem solve. They listen to most opinions. Most members stay with the group and stays focused.
Needs Improvement

The team seems disorganized at times. Members interact with other groups most days.
Unsatisfactory

The team needs an intervention to put it back on track and help it function productively.
Progress

Is work with your team contributing to your understanding of your White Paper topic?
Does everyone contribute?

Excellent

The team thus far is working on schedule. The work has been shared evenly. Everyone is learning from this experience. Progress is being made on project.
Satisfactory

The team is a little off schedule for the time given thus far. There have been set backs but have been able to overcome. There are learning moments in this experience. Some progress is being made.
Needs Improvement

Team has done little with the time given to work on project. They don't work together to get over set-backs. The setbacks have had some negative impacts on individual research. Minimal progress.
Unsatisfactory

The team needs an intervention to put it back on track. This has not contributed to individual research. No progress.
Summary

1. How effectively and accurately can you summarise the current state of your research project?

Excellent

Clearly, concisely, and confidently summarises the current state of the project.
Summary is completely accurate and truthful.
Satisfactory

Clearly and concisely summarises the current state of the project. Summary is mostly accurate.
Needs Improvement

Summarises the current state of the project, but not very confidently, clearly, or concisely. The summary may not be accurate.
Unsatisfactory

Has difficulty summarising or describing the state of the project. Strong evidence that the project has been neglected or is not being accomplished.
Introduction/Background

1. How effective is the introduction?
2. Does it clearly state the problem?
3. Does it provide background?

Excellent

Effectively introduces basic purpose of the project.
Clearly states the problem and solution.
Includes clear background for the project.
Satisfactory

Contains information about basic purpose, outlines the problem and the solution, and gives some background, but does not contain enough detail.
Needs Improvement

Sketchy information about purpose, problem, solution, and background. A lot of development is needed.
Unsatisfactory

Very little information and detail about purpose, problem, solution, and background provided.
Position

1. How aware are you of audience's needs?
2. Do you have a position, argument, or point to make?

Excellent

Clearly states a position with clarity and uses sources to support argument. Effective summary of findings.
Satisfactory

There's a clear argument, however sources are not clearly linked with argument. A summary of findings is included.
Needs Improvement

Argument is not fully defended with evidence from sources. Summary needs a lot of development.
Unsatisfactory

Little or no argument is stated. No real support for argument. No summary.
Organisation

1. Details progress to date with planning, research, and preparation.
2. Outlines schedule and where project stands in relation to it.

Excellent

Substantial progress in planning, research, and preparation. Clear outline of schedule and evidence that project is progression according to plan. Has introduction and conclusion that are a dramatic call for action.
Satisfactory

Progress in planning and research. Has schedule. Has introduction and conclusion that is engaging to the reader. Has some sources which are linked in a logical manner.
Needs Improvement

Has simple introduction and conclusion. Some evidence of a basic plan. Sources are being linked in a logical manner.
Unsatisfactory

No introduction and/or conclusion, No plan. Little evidence of sources. Incoherent.
Resources

1. Are resources being used to support the White Paper's position?
2. Are those sources authoritative and reliable?

Excellent

At least 3 website or hard copy sources used and correctly documented according to correct format. Accurately cites sources.
Satisfactory

At least 2 resources used and documented. Attempt to follow correct format to cite sources.
Needs Improvement

1 resource used. An attempt to cite the source.
Unsatisfactory

Zero resources listed or quoted.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98