Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Elementary Interventionist rubric

iRubric: Elementary Interventionist rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Elementary Interventionist Elementary Academic Coach Interventionist Interview Scoring Rubric Rubric Code: RX635W7 By lsherrill Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: (Other) Grade Levels: K-5

Interventionist Interview
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Exceptional 4 pts
Overall Presentation 5 %	Poor Candidate is dressed unprofessionally; shows no interest for the job, has trouble staying on task and maintaining ey contact, shows no motivation.	Fair Candidate is dressed mildly professional; shows some interest; periodically maintains eye contact with some motivation.	Good Candidate is dressed profesionally, focused and interested; maintains eye contact most of the time; appropriately motivated.	Exceptional Candidate is dressed professionally, extremely focused and interested; maintains eye contact the entire interview; extremely motivated.
Personal Qualities 10 % Tell us a little about your professional experiences that make you qualified for this position.	Poor Candidate had no professional experience.	Fair Candidate expressed little professional experience as it related to this position.	Good Candidate expressed some professional experience as it related to this position.	Exceptional Candidate clearly articulated professional experiences as it related to the position and provided examples demonstrating their relevance.
Research 5 % Describe research-based practices and strategies you have used in your classroom.	Poor Candidate articulated no knowledge of current research-based practices and/or learning strategies.	Fair Candidate articulated some knowledge of current research based practices and/or learning strategies.	Good Candidate articulated adequate knowledge of research based practices and/or learning strategies.	Exceptional Candiate articulted knowledge of several research based practices and/or learning strategies.
Planning and Preparation 5 % What are your goals for this intructional support program?	Poor Candidate's goals are unclear and do not align with the students' needs.	Fair Candidate's goals are partially defined and/or minimally aligned with students' needs and support.	Good Candidate's goals are clear, specific, and appropriate for the needs of the students and the school program.	Exceptional Candidate's goals have been designed in collaboration with teachers and school leaders and are tightly aligned with both students' needs and the school program.
Building Capacity 5 % What does "teamwork" mean to you? Give an example.	Poor Candidate has little concept of the definition of teamwork with no examples. Notes:	Fair Candidate can state a general definition of teamwork with minimal examples. Notes:	Good Candidate can state a good definition of teamwork with detailed examples. Notes:	Exceptional Candidate can state a clear definition of teamwork with strong examples. Notes:
Collaboration 15 % How will you create a respectful and safe culture to promote collaboration?	Poor Candidate shows indifference towards collaboration.	Fair Candidate will create limited opportunites for teachers to collaborate.	Good Candidate will create opportunities for professional learning and teacher collaboration.	Exceptional Candidate will iniate and create multiple opportunites for profesional learning and teacher collaboration.
Communication 10 % How will you work with and communicate with faculty and staff?	Poor Candidate does not maintain communication with faculty and staff.	Fair Candidate maintains some communication with faculty and staff with little detail.	Good Candidate maintains good communication with faculty and staff with some detail.	Exceptional Candidate maintains clear communication with faculty and staff with elaborate detail.
Differentiation 10 % What differentiation mean to you and how have you differentiated instruction in your classroom?	Poor Candidate has little knowledge of differentiation.	Fair Candidate gave a generic definition of differentiation and gave no examples of how it was used in the classroom.	Good Candidate gave an accurate definition of differentiation and articulated 2-3 ways differentiation was implemented in the classroom.	Exceptional Candidate gave an accurate definition of differentiation and articulated 4 or more ways differentiation was implemented in the classroom.
Literacy Components 5 % List the 5 essential components of literacy and explain each.	Poor Candidate has no knowledge of the 5 components.	Fair Candidate has limited knowledge of the 5 components; can list them but did not explain.	Good Candidate listed all 5 components with some knowledge of each component.	Exceptional Candidate listed all 5 components and gave explicit details about each one.
Technology 5 % Describe your use and knowledge of technology.	Poor Candidate has no working knowledge/experience with technology.	Fair Candidate has little working knowledge/experience with technology.	Good Candidate has some working knowledge/experience with technology.	Exceptional Candidate has knowledge/ experience and continues to search for new ideas.
Data Analysis 5 % How have you used student data to inform planning or assessments?	Poor Candidate has limited/no knowledge on using data to plan for instruction and assessments. Notes:	Fair Candidate has some knowledge on using data to plan for instruction and assessments. Notes:	Good Candidate has adequate/varied knowledge of using data to plan for instruction and assessments. Notes:	Exceptional Candidate has extensive knowledge and experience in using data to plam for instruction and assessments. Notes:
Time Management/Organization 10 % Describe your time managemnt and organizational skills.	Poor Candidate could not articulate any time management or organization skills.	Fair Candidate has limited time management and organizational skills.	Good Candidate has time managment skills and could articulate 2-3 examples of their organizational skills.	Exceptional Candidate has time management skills and could articulate 4 or more examples fo their organizational skills.
Professional Development 5 % Describe a professional development session you have attended on a new instructional strategy. What impact did it have on you and your instruction?	Poor Candidate attends professional development but does not implement the new strategies.	Fair Candidate attends only required professional development with little implementation and reflection.	Good Candidate attends more than the required professional development and implements new strategies frequently.	Exceptional Candidate constantly seeks professional development, implements new strategies frequently and encourages other faculty and staff to implement the new strategies.
Questions 5 % Do you have any questions for us?	Poor Candidate had no questions.	Fair Candidate asked question(s) that were not relevant to this position.	Good Candidate asked 1-2 relevant questions pertaining to this position.	Exceptional Candidate asked 3+ relevant questions pertaining to this positiion.

Keywords:

Instruction

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Education rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16