- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: VHS - CAD Drawings rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
VHS - CAD Drawings MHS CAD Drawings Revit Container Housing Project Rubric Code: PXCX4X9 By omurphy57 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

CAD Drawing
	Poor 10.5 pts	Fair 12.5 pts	Good 15.5 pts
Title block	Poor Title block was not used.	Fair PCT Title block was used, but information was not correct and current.	Good PCT Title block was used and all information was correct and current.
Required Components	Poor Did not use or Drawing has no - Walls - Doors - Windows	Fair Drawing has - Walls - Doors - Windows Did not use or Drawing has no - Roof - Floor -Additional Family Groups -Furniture/Appliances - Plumbing and other Fixtures	Good Drawing has - Walls - Doors - Windows Drawing has - Roof - Floor -Additional Family Groups -Furniture/Appliances - Plumbing and other Fixtures
Neatness and Accuracy Precision	Poor Student paid no attention to detail.<BR> Workmanship and quality was of low standard.<BR> Need of improvements were clear and recognizable.	Fair Student did not pay attention to detail.<BR> Workmanship and quality was of moderate standard.<BR> Need of improvements were clear and recognizable.	Good Student paid attention to detail.<BR> Workmanship and quality was of a high standard.
Problem Solving	Poor - With prompting, explores possible approaches to solve the problem	Fair - Draws on prior knowledge and creatively explores possible approaches - Uses flexible reasoning to uncover novel and diverse approaches for solving the problem	Good - Persists in the brainstorming process by testing ideas and reconsidering alternatives - Uses an extended inquiry process, which allows time for incubation of ideas
Persistence	Poor - With assistance, sets goals and works to accomplish goals	Fair - Sets goals and works to accomplish goals despite setbacks or frustrations	Good - Seeks and sets goals and works to accomplish goals despite significant or multiple setbacks or frustrations
Classroom Productivity	Poor This person did not turn assignment in on time. Was at least 2 weeks late.	Fair This person turned in assignment late, but within two weeks and was actively working on it to ensure a higher quality product.	Good This person turned the assignment in on time and with attention to detail and quality craftsmanship.