- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Clinical Lab Testing Learning Module Study rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Clinical Lab Testing Learning Module Study Clinical Lab Testing Learning Module Study To assess an 8 week module and be able to comprehend and revise said material in the module. Rubric Code: P2WA767 By randolba Draft Public Rubric Subject: Health Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Graduate

Module Evaluation 3 How comprehensive is the module?
	Poor Did not meet any content goals or confusing 1 pts	Fair Met some of the content but not advancing in learning 2 pts	Good Criteria met but does not engage the student in the material enough 3 pts	Excellent Criteria met and student fully engaged in the module of the week 4 pts
Content Was fully immersive and introduced a new topic with ease	Poor	Fair	Good I would say that the topic was new but it was definitely boring	Excellent
Learning Progression Progress of learning is comprehensive and develops	Poor	Fair	Good The module did not seem to really develop, the articles at the bottom were very repetitive and they all take a quite some time to read.	Excellent
Engagement Module gives activities and helps to give the student the ability to advance in learning	Poor	Fair The module did have a video which was good but all of the articles at the end had no activity so there didn't really make them seem too important. I would have liked to see maybe a discussion or a set of questions to answer.	Good	Excellent
Relevancy Is the material up to date and most relevant to the knowledge already known	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent The articles were all up to date and they were very interesting but still repetitive.
Organization Is the module organized and follow the learning progression	Poor	Fair	Good The module did progress and knowing how samples are stored is important I am just not sure if that should have been the next module.	Excellent
Scientific Accuracy Is the data being presented correct/Are there any flaws	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent There are no flaws in the data and it all has credible sources.