Skip to main content
iRubric: Bullying Rubric

iRubric: Bullying Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Bullying Rubric 
Bullying Rubric
Plan: Who will use the rubric? Each student in grades 3-5. How the learners and teacher will gain a shared understanding of the rubic. By developing the rubric together, the teacher and the students can determine the areas to be addressed in the skit (content, performance, and creativity) and the criteria used to determine how each area will be graded. Students will clearly understand what is expected. How the rubric will be used to develop student understanding? Based on the students' development of the dialogue, performance and expression of experiences regarding bullying as displayed in the skit. How the rubric informs future instruction? Will be determined based on the teachers' and students' feedback on the effectiveness of the rubric in assessing the students' understanding of the lesson.
Rubric Code: G8BWAW
By jcoppin
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric School Bullying
  Not Meeting

(N/A)

Minimally Meeting

(N/A)

Meeting Expectations

(N/A)

Exceeding

(N/A)

Organization

Not Meeting

Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information.
Minimally Meeting

Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around.
Meeting Expectations

Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow.
Exceeding

Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.
Content

Not Meeting

The story of the skit is dull and does not make rational sense in furthering one's understanding of the important theme of bullying being applied.
Minimally Meeting

The story of the skit is difficult to follow and does not make rational sense in furthering one's understanding of the theme of bullying.
Meeting Expectations

The story of the skit is easy to follow and gives support to the important theme of bullying and ideas of the topic.
Exceeding

There is accurate and rich use of facts that give support to the important theme of bullying and ideas of the topic.
Performance

Not Meeting

The majority of the audience could barely see and hear the skit.
Minimally Meeting

The audience had difficulty seeing and hearing the skit.
Meeting Expectations

The audience had very little difficulty seeing and hearing the skit.
Exceeding

The audience could easily see and hear the skit.
Effort and Attitude

Not Meeting

Poor

The student put little to no effort into the skit and the group grade suffered because of attitude.
Minimally Meeting

Fair

The student could have done more to contribute and/or was not showing enthusiasm in front of the class.
Meeting Expectations

Fair

The student could have done more to contribute and/or was not showing enthusiasm in front of the class.
Exceeding

Excellent

The student was excited and ready to present with a smile! The group benefited from this member!
Time

Not Meeting

Poor

The presentation was less than 1 minutes.
Minimally Meeting

Fair

The presentation was 2 minutes long.
Meeting Expectations

Good

The presentation was 2 minutes long.
Exceeding

Excellent

The presentation was 3 or more minutes long.
Creativity

Not Meeting

Poor

The students presented little creativity in their skit.Students worked together poorly, skit was late, preparation was unorganized, and/or took away from the overall quality of the work
Minimally Meeting

Fair

The student's presentation was a little creative, room for improvement.
Students worked together , skit was on time, preparation was unorganized, and/or took away from the overall quality of the work
Meeting Expectations

Good

The student's presentation was creative and unique, however had room for improvement.
Students worked together with little or no problems, skit was on time, and/or organization was lacking but acceptable.
Exceeding

Excellent

The students' work was very creative and unique!
Participation

Not Meeting

Poor

Did not work well within his/her group, and did not bring ideas to their group.
Minimally Meeting

Fair

Not all group member's participated according to the task.
Meeting Expectations

Good

All group member's fully participated, however, there's room for improvement.
Exceeding

Excellent

All group member's fully participated and brought ideas to their group.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16