Skip to main content
iRubric: Oral Presentation- Book Report 3 (Review) due 10/25 rubric

iRubric: Oral Presentation- Book Report 3 (Review) due 10/25 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Oral Presentation- Book Report 3 (Review) due 10/25 
Oral Presentation- Book Report 2 due 10/7
Students will give a short presentation to the class on their reading book of at least 200 pages, including bibliographic information in MLA format on a note card. Students will demonstrate understanding of the terms studied in class, giving examples (w/ p#) of both sensory imagery and figurative language. Students will also discuss point of view, genre, and explain elements of plot structure including conflict, exposition, inciting force, rising action, crisis, climax, falling action, and resolution. Students will explain if the text begins 'in medias res' or 'ab ovo', uses foreshadowing (cite example and include p#), makes use of flashbacks (cite example and include p#), or follows a completely linear time line. Finally, students will explain why they would or wouldn't recommend the book to other students. Students are required to hand in this self-graded rubric before their presentation on Monday, October 25. 10 points will be deducted for students who lose this rubric.
Rubric Code: G46AX8
By kimvdb
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Oral Book Report
  Excellent

25 pts

Good

23 pts

Average

20 pts

Poor

18 pts

Bibliographic Info

Excellent

-all required bibliographic information in proper MLA format on note card
-has book to show class
-has lexile level of book which is at or above student's own lexile level
Good

-one bibliographic element missing or one mistake in format on note card
-lacks book's lexile level or book is not at or above student's own lexile level
Average

-two or three bibliographic elements missing or mistakes in format; not written on note card
- lacks book's lexile level
Poor

-four or more bibliographic elements missing or mistakes in format; not on note card
-lacks book's lexile level
Content Review from Presentation 1

Excellent

-presentation is clear,
logical, and organized
-all information is
presented: genre, point of view, sensory imagery (with page number) and figurative language (with page number
-thorough understanding
of content and terms
Good

-presentation is
generally clear,
logical, and organized
-considerable
information is
presented but lacking one requirement
-demonstrates
understanding of content and terms
Average

-presentation is
sometimes clear and logical
-quality indicates insufficient preparation
-some information is presented, but lacking two or three requirements
-some understanding of content and terms
Poor

-presentation lacks
clarity
-poorly prepared
-limited information is
presented, lacking more than three requirements of assignment
-weak understanding of content and terms
Content Review from Presentation 2

Excellent

-presentation is clear,
logical, and organized
-all information on plot structure is
presented, including foreshadowing (page number) and/or flashbacks (page numbers)
-thorough understanding
of content and terms
Good

-presentation is
generally clear,
logical, and organized
-considerable
information is
presented but lacking one requirement
-demonstrates
understanding of content and terms
Average

-presentation is
sometimes clear and logical
-quality indicates insufficient preparation
-some information is presented, but lacking two or three requirements
-some understanding of content and terms
Poor

-presentation lacks
clarity
-poorly prepared
-limited information is
presented, lacking more than three requirements of assignment
-weak understanding of content and terms
Recommendation

Excellent

-convincingly supports recommendation, explaining why they did or did not enjoy the book, including a text-to-self, text-to-text or text-to-world connection
Good

-convincingly supports recommendation with explanation
Average

-recommendation is explained inadequately
Poor

-no explanation offered for recommendation




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16