Skip to main content
iRubric: Foundations I: Final Painting Project rubric

iRubric: Foundations I: Final Painting Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Foundations I: Final Painting Project 
Student's had a an independent project based on another artist. Students had to create a composition that was able to emulate the style of any artist of their choice. Students will be graded on over all composition, connection with style of the artist of their choice, class spent in and out of the classroom, progress in their skill/design level, their critique and blog journal.
Rubric Code: E68278
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Project
Progress in skill and design ablility.
  Exceeding

9-10

(N/A)

Fully Meeting

7-8

(N/A)

Meeting

5-6

(N/A)

Minimally Meeting

3-4

(N/A)

Not Yet Meeting

0-2

(N/A)

Understanding
10 pts

Student's artwork should have a likeness to the style of painting of another artist of their choice. They should be growing in both design and painting skill level. Student's work should reflect precise painting skills, blending of colors, and an effort to paint in the style of their artist.

Exceeding

The artwork is planned carefully; understanding of all concepts and instructions is clearly shown.

Student has clearly shown growth in skill level and design ability.

Student's artwork reflects style of another artist.
Fully Meeting

The artwork is planned carefully; understanding of most concepts and instructions is shown.

Student has shown some growth in skill level and design ability.

Student's artwork reflects some of the style of another artist.
Meeting

The art work is planned adequately; understanding of some concepts and instructions shown.

Student has clearly shown growth in skill level and design ability.

Student's artwork reflects very little of the style of another artist.
Minimally Meeting

The artwork shows little evidence of understanding the concepts and instructions.

Student has not shown growth in skill level and design ability.

Student's artwork does not reflect any artist's style.
Not Yet Meeting

The artwork shows no understanding of the concepts and instructions.
Effort
10 pts

What it takes to finish the project as well as possible, time dedicated to the project inside and/or out of class.

Exceeding

The student put forth extraordinary effort to complete the project well as possible; used class time extremely well.
Fully Meeting

The student put forth the effort required to complete the project well; used class time well.
Meeting

The student put forth the effort required to finish the project; used class time fairly well.
Minimally Meeting

The student put forth the effort required to finish the project; used class time adequately.
Not Yet Meeting

The student put forth no effort or the project was not completed; class time was not used well.
Craftsmanship/ Skill
10 pts

Execution of Ideas, application of products (paints and mediums) were carefully and thoughtfully produced

Exceeding

The artwork shows outstanding craftsmanship,with clear attention to detail.
Fully Meeting

The artwork shows good craftmanship, with some attention to detail.
Meeting

The artwork shows average craftmanship and attention to detail.
Minimally Meeting

The artwork shows below average craftmanship and little attention to detail.
Not Yet Meeting

The artwork shows poor craftmanship and no attention to detail.
Composition
10 pts

The composition fills the space of the paper. Colors work well together. Texture/ line quality/ images contributes to the unity of the project.

Exceeding

The composition fills the space of the paper. Colors work well together. Texture/ line quality/ images contributes to the unity of the project.
Fully Meeting

The student used some colors that worked well together, and they worked hard to use texture and line to help them express their representation of their ideas. But there are gaps in the work that keep the viewers eye stuck in one spot.
Meeting

Colors worked well in some areas of the work. Little texture was created. Line quality was supportive to ideas but blending and lack of contour did not help the unity of the piece.
There are gaps in the work that keep the viewers eye stuck in one spot.
Minimally Meeting

Colors did not suite composition as well as the should of. No texture was created, or line quality was considered
Not Yet Meeting

Colors did not suite composition. Student did not give time and effort to create texture. Composition had no planning at all. Composition had no consideration to overall piece.
Final Product Evaluation
Creativity/ Originality
10 pts

Inventiveness, expression of ideas and imagination.

Exceeding

The artwork demonstrates original personal expression and outstanding problem solving skills while still able to show the other artist's style. The student was able to creatively put in both own personal style and another artist style.
Fully Meeting

The artwork demonstrates some personal expression and logical problem solving skills.

The student was able to creatively put in both own personal style and another artist style. But, it was very close to the other artist's original art work.
Meeting

The artwork demonstrates an average amount of personal expression.

The student copied the artist's artwork exactly and did not create their own composition.
Minimally Meeting

The artwork demonstrates little personal expression and problem solving skills.
Not Yet Meeting

The artwork lacks evidence of personal expression.
Blog- Overall
10 pts

Blog should be done after each class and include a synopsis of the day and be accompanied by an image.

Exceeding

Blog is very complete. It shows every stage of the artwork, including a written statement of what happened each day. This is an excellent documentation of the students process and gives the teacher a whole picture of the end result.
Fully Meeting

Blog was completed on time. The student posted both a written statement and an image. The daily written work did not speak to why students made changes or additions to their piece. But it is a good record.
Meeting

The blog was created but only images were posted had very few written entries about process.
Minimally Meeting

The student did some blogging but not everyday. The blog has very little written about it. It is not a very good documentation of the daily archive that was assigned.
Not Yet Meeting

Student did not do much blogging at all. The blog is spotty with big gaps of time missing.
Or the student did not blog at all.
Critique
20 pts

Critique should reflect the project, process, strengths and weaknesses of product.

Student also is asked to critique their peers and participate in class with feedback.

Exceeding

Student turned in and produced a typed critique that was no less than 30 sentences.

Critique reflected project, process, strengths in their work and areas where they could do better.

Student fully participated in the critique giving a good balance of constructive criticism to their peers.
Fully Meeting

Student did write a critique, had full attention to their peers and gave feedback.

However, their critique did not show any real depth in fully evaluating their own work.
Meeting

Critique was not 30 sentences and very little introspection was evident in their critique.

They were able to participate with their peers in others critiques.
Minimally Meeting

Student did not write a critique.

Student did participate with class.
Not Yet Meeting

Student did not write a critique.

Student did not participate with class.
Unity
20 pts

Artwork should reflect unity.
It should have a strong composition.
There should be balance among colors and shape.
All the parts of the artwork come together to make perfect unity.

Exceeding

Artwork all comes together in harmony. Colors, textures, line, all work together.
Composition has asymmetry, diagonal, and thirds that properly work on page.
Fully Meeting

Artwork does have very strong areas that stand out in their excellence.

However, there are other areas that do not work in the art. Instead they are a distraction to the overall piece. These areas were talked about in critique.
Meeting

Artwork has at least two parts of composition, the colors and textures work relatively well together. But, there are large gaps in artwork that do not contribute to the harmony of the art piece.
Minimally Meeting

The work has random areas that do not connect to the rest of the painting.
Student has areas that need more attention and detail in order to contribute tot the overall unity of the piece.
Not Yet Meeting

Students work has no direction. It is sloppily created with little consideration to composition.
There is no theme, idea, or anything of substance present in student's work.



Keywords:
  • Non-Objective Art


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98