Skip to main content
iRubric: Program Review rubric

iRubric: Program Review rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Program Review 
Rubric to be used for Program Review only.
Rubric Code: C48XC
By lindad
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Class note  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  No Info Provided

0 pts

Beginning

1 pts

Developing

2 pts

Accomplished

3 pts

Exemplary

4 pts

1. Curriculum

No Info Provided

None of curriculum is up-to-date or curriculum is not entered in ACRES. Or, no documentation was provided to make that determination.
Beginning

Several significant weaknesses in the Curriculum (Content no longer viable for marketing, etc).
Developing

Curriculum in Need of Revision (One or more years out of date; content weak for marketing, etc).
Accomplished

Up-to-date Curriculum (Current or due for review within the next academic year).
Exemplary

Progressive Curriculum with updates as the need arises to address student and market needs - usually before the 3 year review.
2. Sound Teaching Practices

No Info Provided

No sound teaching practices are evident in the documentation.
Beginning

Uneven and often poor teaching practices and results.
Developing

A need for attention to be directed to some aspects of the teaching enterprise.
Accomplished

Documentation of generally sound teaching practices.
Exemplary

Excellent use of sound teaching practices and creative learning activities are documented.
3. Student Satisfaction

No Info Provided

Lack of documentation of student satisfaction within the program.
Beginning

Dissatisfaction expressed by students in their educational experience with some evidence of steps to improve student satisfaction.
Developing

Some satisfaction of students with their educational experience and some documented evidence with regard to raising student satisfaction.
Accomplished

Moderate to high student satisfaction with the program.
Exemplary

Strong student satisfaction with the program.
4. Evaluation Procedures

No Info Provided

Lack of effective evaluation procedures or lack of information given to the PRC.
Beginning

Minimal use of evaluation procedures.
Developing

Evaluation procedures which are not as effective as they could be.
Accomplished

Routine use of evaluation procedures for most aspects of the program’s outcomes.
Exemplary

Routine use of excellent evaluation procedures for all aspects of the program.
5. Cost Per Student

No Info Provided

No documentation of program costs or FTSE numbers.
Beginning

Average is extremely high.
Developing

Average is moderately high.
Accomplished

Program average falls within the average range for CAC.
Exemplary

Porgram average falls below the CAC average.
6. Enrollment Viability

No Info Provided

Lack of justification of enrollment viability or lack of documentation to support enrollment viability.
Beginning

Minimal justification of enrollment viability.
Developing

Moderate to low justification of enrollment viability.
Accomplished

High to moderate justification of enrollment viability.
Exemplary

Justification of enrollment viability.
7. Strategic Goals

No Info Provided

No visible activities relative to published strategic goals.
Beginning

Relative activities to support 1 strategic goal.
Developing

Demonstrated activities to support 2 strategic goals.
Accomplished

Demonstrated activities to support 3 or 4 strategic goals.
Exemplary

Demonstrated activities to support all five strategic goals.
8. Stakeholders

No Info Provided

No documentation to support the consideration of stakeholders in making decisions.
Beginning

Slight mention of stakeholders.
Developing

Some concern and vision regarding stakeholders and their needs.
Accomplished

Several examples of program recognizing importance of stakeholders and using their input to make decisions.
Exemplary

Excellent activities or examples of involving stakeholders in improving quality.
9. Teamwork & Partnerships

No Info Provided

No teamwork or partnerships documented.
Beginning

Teamwork and partnership mentioned but no real life examples given.
Developing

State the importance and is making plans to develop teamwork and partnerships in the program.
Accomplished

Demonstrates the use of teamwork and partnerships in their documentation. Has been meeting with advisory group at least once a year.
Exemplary

Has set rules or guidelines to practice teamwork or utilize partnerships on a consistent basis throughout the year.
10. Employee Development

No Info Provided

No employee development apparent in documentation.
Beginning

Program is making plans for employee development.
Developing

Program has provided some professional development opportunities to a few employees.
Accomplished

Program offers professional development to every employee related to the program.
Exemplary

Program encourages and offers professional development to all program employees as well as other CAC employees.



Keywords:
  • program review

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16