Skip to main content
iRubric: Peer Rubric - Digital Rhythmic Composition

iRubric: Peer Rubric - Digital Rhythmic Composition

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Peer Rubric - Digital Rhythmic Composition 
Peer Rubric - Digital Rhythmic Composition - for various projects in GarageBand or Logic. 6-8 Music Technology students.
Rubric Code: KXB36X3
By aaronirwin
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric MU:Cr1.1.T.Ia
  Level 4: Exceeds Standards

4 pts

Level 3: Meets Standards

3 pts

Level 2: Approaches Standards

2 pts

Level 1: Emerging

1 pts

Tempo

Level 4: Exceeds Standards

Tempo is absolutely steady throughout the entire composition. This sounds like a metronome was used while composing.
Level 3: Meets Standards

Tempo is steady throughout most of the the composition. I can't tell if a metronome was used while composing.
Level 2: Approaches Standards

Tempo is only occasionally steady. I don't think a metronome was used while composing.
Level 1: Emerging

Little or no thought was given to the tempo of this composition. Tempo is irregular throughout the entire composition. This sounds like rhythms were just randomly being played.
Rhythmic Idea Clarity

Level 4: Exceeds Standards

Listener can reproduce the rhythmic idea very easily. If there are multiple rhythmic tracks, care was given toward making them rhythmically complimentary. These rhythms are really stuck in my head now.
Level 3: Meets Standards

Listener can reproduce most of the rhythmic idea. If there are multiple rhythmic tracks, some care was given toward making them rhythmically complimentary. These rhythms are somewhat catchy.
Level 2: Approaches Standards

Although a rhythmic idea may exist, it is difficult for the listener to identify any pattern. Additional rhythmic tracks exist, but only add to the confusion. These rhythms are not catchy at all.
Level 1: Emerging

Little or no thought was given to the rhythmic idea. No rhythmic organization exists. This sounds like rhythms were just randomly being played.
Rhythmic Development

Level 4: Exceeds Standards

Rhythmic idea is developed two or more times and demonstrates a form of variation (binary, ternary, theme & variations). Listener can clearly identify the main rhythmic idea, as well as the variations.
Level 3: Meets Standards

Rhythmic idea is developed at least once and roughly adheres to a form of variation. Listener can identify the rhythmic idea and at least one variation.
Level 2: Approaches Standards

Rhythmic idea may be stated, but little or no thought was given to the development. Listener is unable to identify the rhythmic idea or a variation.
Level 1: Emerging

Little or no thought was given to the development of the rhythmic idea. This sounds like rhythms were just randomly being played.
Instrumentation

Level 4: Exceeds Standards

Instrument selection conveys thoughtful planning that supports the overall rhythmic composition and timbre. These instruments sound great together.
Level 3: Meets Standards

Some thought was given to the selection of complimentary instruments. These instruments sound ok together.
Level 2: Approaches Standards

Instrument selection conveys very little planning and is distracting to the overall rhythmic idea. These instruments do not sound good together.
Level 1: Emerging

Little or no thought was given to the instrumentation. This sounds like rhythms were just randomly being played.
Technological Know-how

Level 4: Exceeds Standards

Composer's thorough understanding of the software (GarageBand, Logic, etc.) and hardware used (digital keyboard, microphone, etc.) facilitated this exemplary rhythmic composition.
Level 3: Meets Standards

Composer's understanding of the software and hardware helped with this rhythmic composition.
Level 2: Approaches Standards

Composer lacks the basic understanding of the software and hardware used. Their inability to successfully utilize these digital tools distracts from their overall rhythmic idea.
Level 1: Emerging

Composer has little or no understanding of the software and hardware used and was unable to properly compose a basic rhythmic composition.



Keywords:
  • Music rhythm composition rubric MCA music technology creating

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16