Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Engineering Design Process: Index Card Towers rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Engineering Design Process: Index Card Towers
Engineering Design Process: Index Card Towers
This rubric is used to assess the students' use of the engineering design process for designing an Index Card Tower.
Rubric Code:
K2XA893
By
forthelove
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5, 6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Engineering Design Process
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Design
Poor
Your design lacked materials that were needed. It was really hard for me to tell what you built or were building.
Fair
Some materials were used correctly.
Good
Good use of the materials and plan. The tower was nice and well put together, but there were parts that weren't well made.
Excellent
Great use of materials! You maximized your use of materials and created a great tower.
Collaboration
Poor
You did not collaborate at all with your partner, but worked on your design process by yourself. No feedback was given or received.
Fair
You collabarated very little with your partner in the dssign process and hardly gave/received feedback and suggestions.
Good
You collaborated most of the design process with your partner and gave/received feedback and suggestions.
Excellent
You collaborated throughout the design process with your partner and gave and received feedback and suggestions.
Criteria - height
Poor
Tower was less than 12 inches tall
Fair
Tower was between 12 to 15 inches tall
Good
Tower was between 16-20 inches tall
Excellent
Tower was between 21-24 inches tall
Criteria-stability
Poor
Tower was not stable and fell immediately when the stuffed animal was placed on it.
Fair
Tower was somewhat stable, and held the stuffed animal for less than 20 seconds before it started shifting
Good
Tower was quite stable, and held the stuffed animal for 20-30 seconds before the tower started shifting
Excellent
Tower was extremely stable and held the stuffed animal for over 30 seconds without it shifting.
Time Management
Poor
Did not use time well. Time was wasted during the brainstorming and design phase of engineering.
Fair
Sometimes used time well. There were times when you got off task during brainstorming and design phase.
Good
Good use of time, there were a few times when you got off task, but for the majority of the task time was well spent.
Excellent
Great use of time.You stayed on task during each phase of the process.
Subjects:
Engineering
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.