iRubric: Video of chemical experiment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Video of chemical experiment

MARKING RUBRIC FOR VIDEO - GROUP WORK

Rubric Code: ZXW7827

By cifellay

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Chemistry

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Video Marking Rubric Topic: Chemical reaction filmed in class - group work
	Not shown 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Good 2 pts	Excellent 3 pts
Preparation Students are ready to perform the experiment before the lesson starts: they have completed the "preparation for prac's video" worksheet in advance.	Not shown Students were not ready at all on the day of the experiment: they did not hand in the "preparation for prac's video" worksheet.	Poor Students had not fully completed their "preparation for prac's video" worksheet before the experiment, but had at least a partial understanding of the aim, the equipment and the methods.	Good Students were ready for the experiment, they had completed their "preparation for prac's video" worksheet. However, some adjustments needed to be made before the experiment could be started.	Excellent Students were ready for the experiment, they had carefully completed the "preparation for prac's video" worksheet prior to the day of the experiment.
Introduction At the start of the experiment, the students should introduce themselves and one of them should say the title of the experiment.	Not shown Students did not introduce themselves at the start of the video and/or did not state the title of the experiment.	Poor Students either forgot to introduce themselves or to let the viewers know about the title of the experiment.	Good Students introduced themselves and the title of the experiment, but took more than 30 seconds of filming time.	Excellent Students introduced themselves and the title of the experiment. This did not take more than 30 seconds of filming time.
Aim One student should say what the aim of the experiment is.	Not shown Students did not explain the aim of the experiment.	Poor Students only partially explained the aim of the experiment.	Good Students explained the aim of the experiment properly but took too much time (more than 20 seconds of filming time). This sequence was filmed in a separate file instead of being in the same scene as the introduction.	Excellent Students explained the aim of the experiment in a clear and concise way. This did not take more than 20 seconds of filming time and should be in the same video file as the introduction.
Equipment The equipment should be filmed and one student should say the name of each piece of equipment	Not shown Students did not film and name all the pieces of equipment needed for the experiment.	Poor Students only presented some of the pieces of equipment and did not mention their names in the video.	Good Students presented all pieces of equipment but forgot to mention their names, or students forgot to mention a few pieces of equipment.	Excellent Students presented all pieces of equipment and mentioned their names in the video. Students could prepare labels for the pieces of equipment to make it more visual.
Commenting Every time a step is performed, one student should comment on what is being done: "We pour 100 mL of water into the flask".	Not shown The chemical reaction was not filmed. No comments were made during the videoing.	Poor Most steps were not commented, or not properly commented.	Good Some steps were commented but not all.	Excellent All steps were properly commented.
Relevance of filmed scenes The filmed scenes have been carefully selected to clearly show what the experiment looked like at the start, during the reaction and at the end. The viewer should be able to understand what has been done.	Not shown Filmed scenes were not relevant to the experiment.	Poor Scenes were not carefully selected and there were times were the video should have been stopped. It is difficult for the viewer to understand how the experiment was performed.	Good Scenes were generally carefully selected and the viewer could most of the time understand what has been done.	Excellent All scenes were carefully selected and viewers easily understand what has been done.
Video quality The quality of the video enables viewers to understand the experiment (not too shaky, proper zoom). The total length of the video does not exceed 5 minutes.	Not shown The video was too short or too long, and filmed in a way that does not enable viewers to make sense of the experiment.	Poor The quality of videoing was poor or the experiment was too short or too long. However, if they make the effort viewers can understand what has been done.	Good The quality of the videos were good but the timing was not respected. The total number of videos was more than 5 videos of 1 minute.	Excellent The quality of the video was good and the timing was appropriate to the experiment. In total there were no more than than 5 videos of 1 minute submitted.
Participation of all students Speaking time is shared equally between the students. Each student says something in the video.	Not shown Only one or two students participated in the filming, to the detriment of the other group members.	Poor More than one student participated in the videoing but tasks were not shared equally. One student did not participate at all.	Good All students participated but tasks were not shared equally. Some students spoke a lot more than others.	Excellent All students participated and speaking times were shared between all students.
Organisation skills The videos are uploaded on Edmodo with a clear file name by the due date.	Not shown Videos were not submitted on time, and when they were submitted they had no clear file name.	Poor Videos were not submitted on time or videos were submitted on time but with no appropriate file names.	Good Videos were submitted on time but the file names could have been clearer.	Excellent Videos were submitted on time and with appropriate file names.

Subjects:

Chemistry

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric