iRubric: Presentation SMU rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Presentation SMU

Psychological Disorder Presentation Rubric

Students will present on am EBP

Rubric Code: ZXW5X33

By adler1

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Psychology

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Graduate

Presentation Rubric
	Poor but work submitted 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts	Outstanding 5 pts
Clarity/Organization 5 pts	Poor but work submitted Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information. low sequence. Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear. Power Point is not organized. Information is not clearly presented. Student uses superfluous graphics or no graphics	Fair Audience has difficulty following presentation because students jump around. Power Point is not organized. Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. Information is not clearly presented. Student occasionally uses graphics that rarely support text and presentation.	Good Students present information in logical sequence which audience can follow. Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation. Power Point is organized and somewhat easy to follow. Information is clearly presented. Student graphics relate presentation.	Excellent Students present information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow. Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation. Power Point is organized and easy to follow. Information is clearly presented. Student graphics explain and reinforce presentation.	Outstanding students are advance that's why they are able to understand properly. information is highly specified and ppt is clearly presented. Presentations are too good because the stuffs are too much good.
Facilitation of discussion 5 pts	Poor but work submitted The student presented	Fair The student provided minimal opportunities for the audience to be engaged of the learning process.	Good The student provided indication of opportunities for the audience to be engaged of the learning process.	Excellent The student provided some indication of intentional opportunities for the audience to discuss, experience, participate, or be engaged of the learning process.	Outstanding The student provided clear indication of intentional opportunities for the audience to discuss, experience, participate, or be engaged of the learning process.
Enter Title
	Enter Title 5 pts	Enter Title 6 pts	Enter Title 7 pts	Enter Title 8 pts	Enter Title 10 pts
Synthesizing 10 pts	Enter Title The presentation does not include a description of the practice and/or is missing examples. Includes less than 5 research studies which demonstrate some critical thinking	Enter Title The presentation includes a description of the practice, examples for treating addictions. Includes 5 research studies which demonstrate some critical thinking	Enter Title The presentation includes a description of the practice, examples, and how this can be utilized/modified for treating addiction. Includes 5 research studies which demonstrate critical thinking	Enter Title The presentation includes a description of the practice, examples, interesting facts, and how this can be utilized/modified for treating addiction. Includes 5 research studies which are synthesized throughout the presentation	Enter Title The presentation includes a description of the practice, examples, interesting facts, and how this can be utilized/modified for treating addiction and/or co-occurring disorders. Includes 6 or more research studies which are synthesized throughout the presentation

Keywords:

Presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric