Skip to main content
iRubric: Literature Review - particle tech - 1st deliverable - 2018-2 rubric

iRubric: Literature Review - particle tech - 1st deliverable - 2018-2 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Literature Review - particle tech - 1st deliverable - 2018-2 
Literature Review
Students must hand in a 1st deliverable for a design project for particle technology engineering. this paper reports on production process from farm to packing of a staple product, rice, soy, beans, etc. process block diagram and other products and byproducts form the industry
Rubric Code: ZXBW728
By tebbiechale
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Project deliverable
Particle technology and engineering
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2.5 pts

Good

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Content of Document
20 %

Students complied with content items with good quality
Poor

Document fails greatly to meet the requested contents, provides excesive additional information with little relevance to the future design project
Fair

Document fails to showcase two or more of requested content items, or present two or more in a very superficial manner, fails to provide relevant information to the future design in some items.
Good

Document contains most of the requested items and coverage is mainly of good quality, some deficiencies of coverage or content may be evident but overall is a pretty much a complete document, with good insights for the future design project.
Excellent

Document contains all requested items and are developed with equal rigor, provides god information and some additional information that will be relevant for future design of the process plant
Organization
15 %

Students show organizational and redaction skills
Poor

Lack of organization, incoherent development and/or unreadable.
Fair

In general, writing is logically organized. Some support and flow among paragraphs. Reader has a fairly clear idea of what the writer intends.
Good

Writing is logically organized to support the central purpose. The reader can follow the structure of the paper and understands the writer's intentions.
Excellent

Ideas are arranged logically to support the purpose of the paper. content of sentences clearly flow from one to the other. Paragraphs also are clearly linked to each other. The reader can easily follow the paper.
Sentence Structure
15 %

Students are able to present clear ideas
Poor

Errors in sentence structure are frequent enough to be a major distraction to the reader, or Whole paragraphs seem to be taken directly from sources without any editing attempt,
Fair

Some sentences are awkwardly constructed so that the reader is occasionally distracted or, Sentence structure greatly varies from one section to another of the paper, showing little effort to editing,
Good

Sentences are well-phrased and there is some variety in length and structure. Flow from sentence to sentence is generally smooth. or, In general sentence structure is uniform some editing was done, presentation is good
Excellent

Sentences are well-phrased and varied in length and structure. They flow smoothly from one to another. and The text has been comprehensively edited, and well presented
Effort put forth
15 %

All document content was written in english, figures and graphs were adapted or redone
Poor

many images, tables and flow charts were taken directly from a secondary source and no translation was put forth for them, no effort was given to presentation
Fair

a few charts, diagrams, tables or figures were taken from secondary sources with little translation attempt. Presentation was basic
Good

One or two diagrams, figures, tables or charts were taken from secondary sources but are in english.
Excellent

All charts, diagrams and figures were adapted by students or rewritten by them, and all are in english.
Grammar, spelling, punctuation
15 %

Students show good grammar and spelling
Poor

There are so many errors the meaning is obscured. Student obviously did not proof read the paper at all.
Fair

Paper has many distracting errors. Perhaps some editing did occur.
Good

There are occasional errors, but they are not too distracting and do not obscure the meaning of the sentence.
Excellent

Writing is free or almost free of errors.
Use of References
15 %

Students show respect for authorship
Poor

Student failed to cite sources. Very few references given throughout paper, even though the content clearly did not originate from the student.
Fair

Although attributions are occasionally given, many statements seem unsubstantiated. Sources of information are unclear.
Good

Professionally legitimate sources are generally present and attribution is, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. Student made a good effort at citing sources.
Excellent

Compelling evidence from legitimate sources are given. Attribution is clear and fairly represented.
compliance with requisites
5 %

WORD format,
file name requisites
6-8 pages of content
calibri font, size 11, single line spacing, good presentation
Poor

only ore or two items regarding format were fulfilled
Fair

2 or 3 items regarding format were not fulfilled
Good

1 item regarding format was not fulfilled
Excellent

all items requested regarding format were fulfilled



Keywords:
  • technical writing, literature review, science, engineering

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16