Skip to main content
iRubric: First Nation's Contributions IN 6.2 rubric

iRubric: First Nation's Contributions IN 6.2 rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
First Nation's Contributions IN 6.2 
IN6.2 c. Investigate the contributions of First Nations, Métis, and Inuit people in Canada and indigenous peoples in a selection of countries bordering the Atlantic Ocean to local, provincial, national and global communities in various areas such as politics, business, health, education, sport, music, literature, art, dance, and architecture. A research project on First Nation's contributions locally, provincially, and nationally as well as in a country bordering the Atlantic ocean.
Rubric Code: ZXB7BW3
By MrsBaker18
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Contribution locally

IN 6.2
Poor

There is no example of groups of First Nation's people that have contributed locally in your area or examples are poorly explained. No conversation was had with teacher about difficulty finding one.
Fair

There are 1 well explained examples of people or groups of First Nation's people that have contributed locally in your area,
Good

There are 2 well explained examples of people or groups of First Nation's people that have contributed locally in your area.
Excellent

There are 3 or more well explained examples of people or groups of First Nation's people that have contributed locally in your area.
Contribution Provincially

In 6.2
Poor

There is no example of groups of First Nation's people that have contributed provincially in your area or examples are poorly explained. No conversation was had with teacher about difficulty finding one.
Fair

There are 1 well explained examples of people or groups of First Nation's people that have contributed Provincially in your area.
Good

There are 2 well explained examples of people or groups of First Nation's people that have contributed Provincially in your area.
Excellent

There are 3 or more well explained examples of people or groups of First Nation's people that have contributed Provincially in your area.
Contribution Nationally

IN 6.2
Poor

There is no example of groups of First Nation's people that have contributed nationally in your area or examples are poorly explained. No conversation was had with teacher about difficulty finding one.
Fair

There are 2 well explained examples of people or groups of First Nation's people that have contributed Nationally in your area.
Good

There are 2 well explained examples of people or groups of First Nation's people that have contributed Nationally in your area.
Excellent

There are 3 or more well explained examples of people or groups of First Nation's people that have contributed Nationally in your area.
Comparing to Atlantic Country

In 6.2
Poor

There is nothing addressing how the First Nation's people in your Atlantic country contribute to your area. No conversation was had with teacher about difficulty finding one.
Fair

The slide addressing the contribution of First Nation's people in your Atlantic country is not well explained.
Good

There is a slide addressing how First Nation's people in the Atlantic country contribute( Or Haven't) in this area.
Excellent

There is a slide explaining in detail how First Nation's people in the Atlantic country contribute( Or Haven't) in this area.
Visuals

CC6.4 e,f,g,h.
CC7.5 g.
Poor

Point of the powerpoint(or other visual) is unclear, as well as the slides are disorganized.
Fair

It may not be clear what the powerpoint presentation(or other visual) is about, or slides may not be organized well.
Good

It is easy to read what area the powerpoint(or other visual) is on. Slides are mostly neat and easy to read.
Excellent

It is clear what area the powerpoint(or other visual) is on. Slides are neat and easy to read.
Presentation

CC6.6
CC7.7 (7.6 Small group)
Poor

Presentation is hard to follow. Voice level is inappropriate. There is not transitions, and/or a conclusion.
Fair

Planning of presentation may not be noticeable and may experience issues. Voice level is not always appropriate. Transitions, and/or a conclusion may be missing
Good

Presentation is well planned out and goes smoothly. Voice level is usually appropriate. There is transitions, and/or a conclusion.
Excellent

Presentation is well planned out and is engaging to watch. Voice level is appropriate. There is transitions, and a conclusion.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98