iRubric: Mini Personal Project Peer Assessment rubric

FIRSTNAME did not present an explanation. Other genres such as narration or description were wrongly used in this context.

The presentation did not contain explanations about the topic. The explanation of the process and answers to the research questions was not clear enough

The presentation went into enough detail and presented good information on the topic. The audience were engaged in the talk. A clear statement of purpose was given.

A very interesting and thorough presentation. The organization. All stages of the explanation were covered. The audience was convinced of the takeaways from this presentation

The slides and delivery are dull and unexciting. There is too much text and it is being read to us.

There is some structure but the slides lack timing and more preparation was necessary. There is no Pecha Kucha.

The slides are imaginative. They are very clearly presented using key words and well organised speaker notes. An attempt at Pecha Kucha has been made. However the timing needs work.

The slides are original creative and informing. Pecha Kucha has been used to time the presentation to 1 minute 20 in total.