iRubric: Engineering Design Process 2 rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Engineering Design Process 2

Engineering Design Process

This rubric is used to assess the students' use of the engineering design process.

Rubric Code: ZX397XW

By emerritt_tea

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Engineering

Type: Project

Grade Levels: K-5

Engineering Design Process
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Plan	Poor Little or no evidence was planned out. They did not plan what they were going to build nor plan on what materials to use in the building.	Fair Some evidence of a plan. There was some thought to materials/building, but not really thought out.	Good Good evidence of planning done. Materials were listed and thought out, but the plan wasn't quite complete.	Excellent I can really see what you are going to be building. All materials were listed and well thought out.
Design	Poor Your design lacked materials that were needed. It was really hard for me to tell what you built or were building.	Fair Some materials were used correctly.	Good Good use of the materials and plan. The project was well put together, but there were parts that weren't well made.	Excellent Great use of materials! You maximized your use of materials.
Time Management	Poor Did not use time well. Time was wasted during the imagine, plan, and design phase of engineering.	Fair Sometimes used time well. There were times when the individual got off task during the imagine, plan, and design phase.	Good Good use of time, a few times the individual got off task, but for the majority of the task time was well spent.	Excellent Great use of time. The individual stayed on task during each phase of the process.
Participation	Poor Individual had to be reminded several times to stay on task.	Fair Individual participated in the building process. Had to be redirected a few times.	Good Individual worked together were not redirected that much.	Excellent Individual worked together. The group never had to be redirected.
Oral Presentation
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Body Language	Poor Does not have eye contact with the Audience.	Fair Occasionally engages the audience by making and maintaining eye contact and using movement.	Good Usually engages the audience by making and maintaining eye contact and using movement.	Excellent Actively engages the audience by making and maintaining eye contact and using movement.
Presentation	Poor Not enough preparation was done for the presentation of the information and lacks many elements of what is expected.	Fair The information presented is not clearly displayed throughout the project.	Good The student presents the information fairly and clearly and displays a reasonable understanding of their information.	Excellent The student presents the information clearly and displays a complete understanding of their information. It is evident that the student was well prepared.
Enunciation	Poor Often mumbles or can not be understood or mispronounces more than one word. Volume often too soft to be heard by all audience members.	Fair Speaks clearly and distinctly most of the time. Mispronounces more than one word. Volume often too soft to be heard by all audience members.	Good Speaks clearly and distinctly all the time, but mispronounces a few words. Volume is loud enough to be heard by all audience members most of the time.	Excellent Speaks clearly and distinctly all the time, and does not mispronounce words. Volume is loud enough to be heard by all audience members throughout the entire presentation.
Project Specifications
	None 0 pts	Average 1 pts	Excellent 2 pts	(N/A)
Decorations	None Project was not decorated	Average Project was decorated a little.	Excellent Project was decorated and looked appealing.	N/A
Measurements	None Did not meet length or height requirements.	Average Met the height or length requirements.	Excellent Went above and beyond the height or length requirements.	N/A
Travel	None Did not travel the required distance.	Average Traveled the required distance.	Excellent Traveled the required distance and then some more.	N/A

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric