iRubric: Presentation of Course Modules rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Presentation of Course Modules

This is a/an { }Individual { }Group presentation on an assigned module from the adopted text along with added information from selected sources. All presentations should be no longer than 30-45 minutes; If a 'group' presentation, all members will actively participate in presenting the information.

Rubric Code: Z893W9

By luckielinda

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Psychology

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Content Presentation
	Poor 1 pts	Adequate 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Overall aesthetics 15 % Visual appeal (size of print, color does not distract reader)	Poor Background makes the presentation hard to read. Graphics are confusing and not related to words. Too much movement in the slides. Many slides hard to read.	Adequate There are too few graphic elements. Appropriate background. Some slides are hard to read.	Good Appealing graphic elements are included appropriately. Slides are readable, but wordy. Annimations are used, but are sometimes distracting.	Excellent Appealing graphic elements are included appropriately. Slides are easy to read and annimations are used effectively.
Mechanics 10 % Grammar, spelling, and formatting (APA formatted documentation such as Reference page, Executive Summary)	Poor There are many errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Bullet format is not consistent or clear. Too much information on many slides.	Adequate There are some (4-5) errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Bullet format is not consistent on a few slides. Too much information on four or more slides.	Good There are infrequent (1-2) errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Bullet format is consistent on all slides. Too much information on two or more slides.	Excellent There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Bullets are consistent and clear. Information is clear and concise on each slide.
Presentation skills 5 % Group working to deliver presentation.	Poor Two or more of the presenters didn't know the information and got lost often. Diction and voice level made listening difficult. Presnters read all their notes and fail to make eye contact with audience.	Adequate One presenter didn't know the information and they got lost often. Diction and voice level made listening difficult for the audience. Presenters mostly read notes and make infrequent eye contact with audience.	Good All presnters knew the information and only got lost on occassion. Diction and voice level made listening easy for the audience. Presenters mostly maintained eye contact with the audience, and referenced their notes on occasion.	Excellent All presenters knew the information and progressed smoothly through the presentation. Diction and voice level engaged the audience in the presentation. Presenters maintain eye contact with audience, seldom returneing to their notes.
Expert Connections 5 % Accuracy and application of information (Literature Review)	Poor Information presented is entirely inaccruate. No examples are given to help audience members apply terms and concepts.	Adequate Information presented is somewhat accurate. A few examples are given to help audience members apply terms and concepts.	Good Information presented is entirely accurate. Presenters offer many examples and often elborate on, extend, and explain information to audience members.	Excellent Information presented is entirely accurate. Presenters have demonstrated the meaning of material by correctly ebloarting, extending and explaining information to audience members.
Facts and Information 30 % Depth of topic area information (Textbook)	Poor The topic area was presented without focus. Very little information on the history of the topic area and current issues in the topic area. Failed to present the relation between the topic area and program proposal topic.	Adequate There was adequate information about the topic area. Basic info on the history of the topic area, and current issues in the topic area. Relation between the topic area and program proposal topic was weak.	Good Good information on the history of the topic area and current issues in the topic area, but some areas deserved further attention. The relation between the topic area and program proposal topic was clear.	Excellent Comprehensive information on the history of the topic area and current issues in the topic area. The relation between the topic area and program proposal topic was clear and strong.
Group Facilitating Skills 15 % Responding to questions from moderator and/or audience -	Poor Presenters do not have grasp of information; presenters cannot answer questions about subject matter.	Adequate Presenters are at ease with expected answers to most questions, but fail to elaborate on question answers.	Good Presenters are at ease with expected answers to most quetions and ellobrate on most question answers.	Excellent Presenters demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.
Presentation Lenght
	Poor 1 pts	Adequate 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Length of presentation 5 % 30 min - 45 min.	Poor Presentation was within 5 minutes of the range for appropriate length.	Adequate Presentation was within 2 minutes of the range for appropriate length.	Good Presentation was within 1 minute of the range for appropriate length	Excellent Presentation was within range for appropriate length.
Methodology & Design The methodology and design of the presentation encourages interactive learning (e.g. cooperative & coillaborative efforts by auidence)
Engage Audience 15 % The best learning takes place when the audience is engaged. Engaging the audience and creating an active learning environment,	Poor Presenters do little or nothing to create an interactive learning environment in which the audience actively participates. Audience is passive listeners	Adequate Presenters make some provision(s) for audience interaction with presenters. At least 10% of the audience is required to participate	Good Presenters make clear provision for audience interactive learning beyond the presenters. For example, a hands-on activity that engages 30% of the audience	Excellent Presenter(s) make clear provision for auidence intractive learning that engages 50% of the audience and demonstrates audience-to-audience active participation. For example, audience role play.

Keywords:

Psychology, Textbook, Course Modules, Themes

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric