Skip to main content

iRubric: Interview with a Philosopher rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Interview with a Philosopher 
Interview with Child Development Theorists
Rubric Code: Z5XW25
By shenantl
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Interview with Theorists
  Poor Development

(N/A)

Satisfactory Development

(N/A)

Very Well Developed

(N/A)

Background Information

Poor Development

Little or no background information about a particular philosopher was included
Satisfactory Development

Sufficient background information about a particular philosopher was included
Very Well Developed

Detailed background information about a particular philosopher was included
Basic Assumptions

Poor Development

Basic assumptions are not clear and not very well explained; key concepts are not defined and developed
Satisfactory Development

Basic assumptions were discussed and explained; key concepts are provided, but with limited development
Very Well Developed

Basic assumptions are clear and very well explained; key concepts are defined and developed with examples
Strengths & Insights

Poor Development

Strengths and insights for awareness of implications for what and how we teach were vaguely discussed and explained with little to no support or examples
Satisfactory Development

Strengths of approach were generally described with limited support; and two or more implications to what and how we teach were mostly discussed and explained
Very Well Developed

Strengths of approach were specifically described and supported; and two or more implications for how and what we teach are clear, exemplified and relevant
Criticisms/Limitations

Poor Development

Very little or no criticisms/limitations were presented
Satisfactory Development

Criticisms/limitations were presented with limited development
Very Well Developed

Criticisms/limitations were debated, explained, or presented clearly
Formating & Style Requirements

Poor Development

The paper length, format and/or reference requirements were not followed and fell short of the minimum number; and/or excessive wordiness makes it difficult to understand
Satisfactory Development

The paper length, format and/or reference requirements were not completely followed; and mostly clearly written
Very Well Developed

The paper length, format and reference requirements were followed; and clearly written
Overall Organization

Poor Development

Structure is not clear, introduction and conclusion is not relevant to body of paper or is missing; paragraph are disjointed and lack transitions in many areas
Satisfactory Development

Structure is mostly clear, includes sufficiently developed and relevant introduction and conclusion; paragraph transitions are mostly logical and maintain flow of thought throughout
Very Well Developed

Structure is clear, includes well developed and relevant introduction and conclusion; paragraph transitions are logical and maintain flow of thought throughout




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243