Skip to main content
iRubric: Information Literacy: Humans Right's discussion rubric

iRubric: Information Literacy: Humans Right's discussion rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Information Literacy: Humans Right's discussion 
Information Literacy
Information literacy activity based on reading notices about Human's right's
Rubric Code: Z2XAA6C
By SandraBett
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Information Literacy
Students determine the information needed and locate appropriate resources from various sources using effective searching techniques and parameters.
  Poor

1 pts

Enought

2 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Understands information task
5 pts

Reflects on the uses and influence of the media in shaping public opinion
Poor

Has difficulty defining the scope of the research question. Has difficulty determining key concepts. Types of information (sources) selected do not relate to concepts or answer research question.
Enought

Defines the scope of the research question incompletely (parts are missing, remains too broad or too narrow, etc.). Can determine key concepts. Types of information (sources) selected partially relate to concepts or answer research question.
Fair

Defines the scope of the research question With some lacks. Can determine almost all key concepts. Types of information (sources) selected relate to concepts or answer research question.
Good

Defines the scope of the research question completely. Can determine key concepts. Types of information (sources) selected relate to concepts or answer research question.
Excellent

Effectively defines the scope of the research question. Effectively determines key concepts. Types of information (sources) selected directly relate to concepts or answer research question.
Search Strategies
5 pts

Identify ways in which the media can influence our view of the world and constitute a means of intervention
Poor

Uses illogical searches and accesses information randomly that does not satisfy the information task.
Enought

Uses simple searches. Cannot effectively refine search and retrieves information from limited and similar sources.
Fair

Uses multiple but not always adjust to the logical search terms and database parameters to access some relevant information sources.
Good

Uses some logical search terms and database parameters to access some relevant information sources.
Excellent

Effectively use a variety of logical search terms and database parameters to retrieve most appropriate information sources.
Working as a group
5 pts

Learn to communicate and respect each other's opinions.
Poor

Rarely completed his or her share of work; almost always needed to be prodded.
Enought

Contributed good effort to the group’s project.
Was helpful and cooperative in completing his or her share.
Fair

Did a average job of organizing group efforts and keeping people on track.Completed his or her share with an average effort.
Good

Did a good job of organizing group efforts and keeping people on track.Completed his or her share with great effort.
Excellent

Contributed exceptional effort to the group’s project.Went above and beyond the call of duty to further group’s work.
Presentation
5 pts

Critically interpret media messages, identifying the author's perspective
Poor

Group's search strategies were not documented. The information retrieved did not satisfy the task and was presented in a disorganized way.
Enought

Group's search strategies were not all documented.
Much of the retrieved information did not satisfy the task and was presented in a disorganized manner with some members participating.
Fair

Group's search strategies were documented. Most of the information retrieved satisfied with some lacks the task and was shared with almost of members participating.
Good

Group's search strategies were documented. Most of the information retrieved satisfied the task and was shared with all members participating.
Excellent

Group's search strategies were well documented. Information retrieved satisfied the task and was shared in a clear, engaging way with all members participating.



Keywords:
  • databases, catalog, searching

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16