Skip to main content
iRubric: TEACHER TRAINEE EVALUATION rubric

iRubric: TEACHER TRAINEE EVALUATION rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
TEACHER TRAINEE EVALUATION 
Teacher to Teacher Training Program Effectivity Evaluatuon
Evaluation of the Honduras pilot program for the Teacher to Teacher training network (a non-profit network or professional educators sharing development with developing countries)
Rubric Code: Z2W54B3
By CherylB123
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Teacher to Teacher Training Program
Infection Control Sanitation must be passed requirements of ARTC
  Exceeds Expectations

90

90 pts

Meets Expectations

Trainees must score 85% or higher

85 pts

Partially Meets Expections

70-84

84 pts

Falls Below Expectations

0-70

70 pts

Level I - Reactions
Shows participants reaction to the training program
Introduction and Topic

all trainees must make 85% practical 85% theory & 90% attendance. 100% sanitation & infection control
Exceeds Expectations

Training session has clearly established goals and objectives that are understandable to participants. The topic is of interest and relevant to at least 90% of trainees.
Meets Expectations

Training session has clearly established goals and objectives that are understandable to participants. The topic is of interest and relevant to at least 75% of trainees.
Partially Meets Expections

Training session has clearly established goals and objectives that are understandable to most participants. The topic is of interest and relevant to at least 55% of trainees.
Falls Below Expectations

Training session does not have clearly established goals and objectives that are understandable to participants. The topic is of interest and relevant to less than 55% of trainees.
Materials and Venue

Exceeds Expectations

Training session material is appropriate for self-paced learning and review; it is available to all participants before, during, and after training sessions.
Venue is conducive to learning, and meets the needs of all participants and trainees.
Meets Expectations

Training session material is appropriate for self-paced learning and review; it is available to all participants during and after training sessions.
Venue is conducive to learning, and meets the needs of most participants and trainees.
Partially Meets Expections

Training session material is supports all content; it is available to all participants during and after training sessions.
Venue is appropriate for learning, and meets the needs of most participants and trainees.
Falls Below Expectations

Training session material is less than appropriate for self-paced learning and review; it is available to participants after training sessions only.
Venue is lacks the appropriate accommodations for participant comfort and engagement.
Training and Trainers

Exceeds Expectations

Facilitators are able to address all questions and concerns from participants, and clearly explain content.
Training sessions are set up to support long-term learning and application, and were planned in consideration of participant needs.
Meets Expectations

Facilitators are able to address most questions and concerns from participants, and clearly explain content.
Training sessions are set up to support long-term learning and application, and scheduling is accessible to most participants.
Partially Meets Expections

Facilitators are able to address some questions and concerns from participants, and clearly explain content.
Training sessions are set up to support learning and application, trainees are able to attend more than half of the courses available.
Falls Below Expectations

Facilitators were unable to address questions and concerns from participants, and had difficulty clearly explaining the content.
Training sessions were not planned in consideration of participant needs, making consistent attendance difficult.
Level II - Learning
Shows the level of understanding of the program's topic.
Pre-test and Post-test comparison

Evaluation in:
General program use (after 3 day face to face training).

Material search and creation.

Student report management
Exceeds Expectations

The T2T training course showed a minimum of 20 point growth (from pre to post-test), or show at least 90% accuracy.
Meets Expectations

The T2T training course showed a minimum of 15 point growth (from pre to post-test), or show at least 70% accuracy.
Partially Meets Expections

The T2T training course showed a minimum of 10 point growth (from pre to post-test), or show at least 50% accuracy.
Falls Below Expectations

The T2T training course showed less than 10 point growth (from pre to post-test), or showed less than 50% accuracy.
In-training application

Team collaboration on training product.
Exceeds Expectations

Teams are able to complete tasks in training using the T2T program without the help of a facilitator.
Meets Expectations

Teams are able to complete tasks in training using the T2T program with some assistance.
Partially Meets Expections

Teams are able to complete tasks in training using the T2T program with significant support of a facilitator.
Falls Below Expectations

Teams have difficulties in completing tasks in training using the T2T program even with support from facilitators.
Level III- Behavior
Helps determine if learning is being applied outside the training program.
On-the-job application

Interviews with teachers and principals
Exceeds Expectations

Teachers log in to their training independently and have used T2T consistently in their classrooms.
Meets Expectations

Teachers log into their training with reminders from their educational leaders and have used T2T consistently for classrooms.
Partially Meets Expections

Some teachers log into their training with reminders from their educational leaders and have not used T2T consistently for classroom. Not all teachers are using the program.
Falls Below Expectations

No teachers log into their training even with reminders from their educational leaders and have not used T2T consistently for classroom. Not all teachers are using the program.
Management collaboration

How application is being evaluated by principals
Exceeds Expectations

Expectations for use of T2T program has been reinforced by principals by adding it as an element of PDAS and walk-through evaluations and planning. Teachers using the program have been recognized for their efforts.
Meets Expectations

Expectations for use of T2T program has been reinforced by principals by adding it as an element of PDAS and walk-through evaluations and planning.
Partially Meets Expections

Expectations for use of T2T program has been suggested to teachers by principal with no monitoring.
Falls Below Expectations

Principals have not expressed or reinforced any expectations for the use of the T2T program.
Level IV - Results
Analysis of district benefits gained from applying the program.
Return on Investment

Use of grants and district funds.
Exceeds Expectations

Budget for program was able to cover all expenses allowing for ample support to all participants.
All expenses were tracked and essential to the learning program.
Meets Expectations

Budget for program was able to cover all expenses without compromising important goals or objectives.
All expenses were tracked and most were essential to the learning program.
Partially Meets Expections

Budget for program was able to cover most expenses, allowing for program completion without needs of additional funds.
Most expenses were tracked and essential to the learning program.
Falls Below Expectations

Proper support for program required additional funds not originally considered in the program budget.
Expenses were not properly tracked by program management.
Student Performance

Primary Goal - monitored through student performance indicators.
Exceeds Expectations

Through the consistent use of the T2T tools, students are able to collaborate on projects and complete independent assignments successfully. Student focus has completely shifted from learning to use the tool to the content that is being taught with it, increasing engagement and student centered learning.
Student engagment: 90% or greater.
Meets Expectations

Through the consistent use of theT2T tools, students are able to collaborate on projects and show their knowledge with minimal support. There is increased engagement and student centered learning.
Student engagement: 80% or greater.
Partially Meets Expections

Students are able to use the T2T program with teacher assistance and support. Focus is still on students learning to master the tool, diverting from content.
Student engagement: 60% or greater.
Falls Below Expectations

Students have not mastered the T2T tool and so have not been able to use it to enrich their content and collaborative learning experience.
Student engagement: under 60%.



Keywords:
  • Program Evaluation, Kirkpatrick Evaluation Methods

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16