iRubric: Cybersecurity Ethical Dilemma Debate rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Cybersecurity Ethical Dilemma Debate

PLTW Cybersecurity Activity 2.2.1 Step 2: Industrial espionage cyberattack.

Rubric Code: Z24W425

By kmorten

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Computers

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Cybersecurity Ethical Hackers Students will describe how an ethical hacker tests a system
	Poor 25 pts	Fair 40 pts	Good 80 pts	Excellent 100 pts
Research, use of evidence Examples and facts are given to support reasons.	Poor Research was not clearly present and use of evidence needed more examples to validate the content	Fair Students used information in the presentation that needed more content and facts.	Good Facts were presented by students and followed a logical sequence. Tests were included and overall presentation was effective.	Excellent Students used majority of facts from research and text and presented information in organized and well developed presentation. Group included tests and drew conclusions about ethical hackers
Speech, organization and clarity Speech is well organized and presented Students use charts, and information to explain the phases and tests.	Poor Students made little eye contact with the audience and did not share information in a clear and loud voice	Fair Students did not use loud voices but did share information with the audience and organization was limited.	Good Students shared the presentation well, used a loud voice and spoke clearly. Organization was present	Excellent Voices were loud, and students spoke to the audience and presented to the class effectively. Presentation was well organized.
Understanding of Topic-Ethical Hackers Students understood what Phases Ethical Hackers Use and presented their tests and reasoning.	Poor Research and speech show little or no topic understanding.	Fair Research and speech show a moderate level of topic understanding.	Good Research and speech show a good level of topic understanding.	Excellent Research and speech show a high level of topic understanding.
Use of Academic Language Students use Academic Language to explain the phases of Ethical Hackers	Poor Use of Academic Language is limited. Students do not explain terms or draw on information presented in this lesson to share the content they have learned.	Fair Language does not include many terms associated with ethical hackers and needs more vocabulary that explains the phases clearly.	Good Language uses some cybersecurity terms to define and explain the phases of an ethical hacker.	Excellent Language used is from the Lesson presented on Ethical Hackers and uses Cybersecurity terms that students must know.

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric