- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Arrangement Summative rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Arrangement Summative Arrangement Summative Students are to write an arrangement of the piece that had been transcribed in quarter 2 for two or more other people in their class. Pieces must be at a playable level, written in the correct range for the instruments and transposed correctly. Attention to balance in part writing must be given to have a successful performance. Rubric Code: Z222B75 By aoede2 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Music Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Arrangment Written
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Use of Notation Software 10 %	Poor Was unable to use the program that was chosen effectively.	Fair Had a lot of difficulties that were not successfully solved.	Good Was able to use the software to accomplish the task but could have used it more extensively.	Excellent Excellent use of the software.
Range 20 %	Poor Incorrect range for the instruments in the ensemble.	Fair Made several mistakes in range for the instruments in the ensemble.	Good Made very few mistakes in range for the instruments in the ensemble.	Excellent Wrote the parts in the correct range for the instruments in the small ensemble.
Transposition 20 %	Poor Transpositions were done incorrectly.	Fair Transpositions had many mistakes that detracted from the performance.	Good A couple mistakes were made in transposition.	Excellent Transpositions were done correctly for all instruments.
Creativity 30 %	Poor Piece was strictly copied and transposed for the instruments with nothing changed.	Fair Not much was changed but an attempt was made.	Good Several things were changed to make the piece the students' own interpretation, whether it be dynamics, different rhythms, less or more difficult notes.	Excellent Piece was unique from the transcription/original showing the students' own interpretation... things were added or taken away. There was a different style, change in dynamics, different rhythmic interpretations, a different arrangement of sections, an introduction, ending, new road map etc.
Balance/Part Writing 20 %	Poor Not any thought as to the difficulty of the parts for the involved instrumentalists/performers or the balance in ensemble.	Fair Some thought given to the difficulty of the parts for the involved instruments/performers and the balance in the ensemble, for example melody vs. accompaniment.	Good A lot of thought given to the difficulty of the parts for the instrumentalists involved as well as the balance in the ensemble, for example melody vs. accompaniment.	Excellent Parts well written with appropriate thought given to the difficulty of the parts for the instrumentalits involved, as well as the balance in the ensemble. Well-written!