iRubric: Curriculum Rubric for Understanding By Design Units

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Curriculum Rubric for Understanding By Design Units

Rubric Code: YXX25X5

By tpettine

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Graduate

Curriculum Rubric for Understanding
	Excellent (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Requires Revision (N/A)
Student Learning	Excellent -Unit Plan requires students to interpret, evaluate, theorize, and/or synthesize information -Targeted enduring objectives are clearly defined, articulated, and supported by the EQ -All enduring objectives clearly align with the content standards, essential questions, the learning plan, and the assessment -Unit plan has well-defined accommodations to support a diversity of learners including gifted and struggling -Questions include overreaching EQ as well as open-ended	Fair -Unit Plan requires students to analyze and apply information, solve problems, and/or make conclusions -Targeted enduring objectives are defined and moderately supported by the Essential and Unit Questions -Some enduring objectives align with state content standards, essential questions and learning plan -Unit plan offers minimal accommodations to support a diversity of learners	Requires Revision -Unit Plan requires students to define, identify, describe, and/or summarize. -Very little higher-order thinking is required to complete the learning objectives -Targeted learning objectives are vague and not clearly supported by the Essential and Unit Questions -Relationship between enduring objectives and state content standards, but relationship to learning plan, essential questions, and learning plan is unclear -Unit Plan does not accommo
Implementation	Excellent -Unit Plan is a well-developed guideline for implementation -Unit Plan can be easily modified and implemented in a variety of classrooms	Fair -Unit Plan is an adequate guide for implementation, but some areas are unclear -Unit Plan might be applicable to other classrooms	Requires Revision -Unit Plan lacks clarity and is not an effective guide for implementation -Unit Plan is limited to the teacher’s own classroom implementation
Student Assessment & Evaluation	Excellent -Instrument(s) for authentic assessment of all targeted objectives are included -A clear relationship is evident between learning objective and assessment of student learning -Assessment tools include a topic-specific rubric that builds towards criteria for excellence in order to serve as a helpful scaffold for students -Assessment tools are diverse and include performance as well as self assessment and more traditional tools	Fair -Instrument(s) for assessment of most targeted objectives are included -Some relationship is evident between learning objectives and assessment -Assessment tools contain some topic-specific criteria, but may be unclear to students and are structured as a checklist without establishing a clear continuum of expectations that would be found in a rubric	Requires Revision -Instrument(s) for assessment of targeted objective are not included or the assessment(s) does not match the targeted objectives -Relationship between objectives and assessment tools is unclear -Assessment tools contain only general criteria
Integration of Technology	Excellent -Proposed technology use is engaging, age appropriate, beneficial to student learning and supportive of higher-order thinking skills -Technology is integral to the success of the Unit Plan -A clear relationship between the use of technology and student learning is exhibited by the student samples -Use of technology enhances the Unit Plan by using the computer as a research, collaboration and publishing tool, as well as a communication device	Fair -Proposed technology use is engaging, age appropriate, but it is unclear as to how it enhances student learning -Technology is important, but not integral to the Unit Plan -A limited relationship between the use of technology and student learning is exhibited by the student samples -Use of technology is limited to using the computer as a tool, a publishing tool, a collaboration tool, or a communication device	Requires Revision -Proposed technology is not age appropriate, nor engaging, and does not enhance student learning -Importance of technology to the Unit Plan is unclear -No relationship between the use of technology and student learning is exhibited by the students samples -Unit Plan does not take advantage of research, publishing, collaboration and communication capabilities

Keywords:

UbD, Curriculum, Coetail

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric