Skip to main content

iRubric: Dance History Paper Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Dance History Paper Rubric 
Rubric Code: YXW9XAA
By karenrains
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Dance  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Dance History Paper
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Not Included

0 pts

Intoduction

Excellent

The introduction
1. grabbed the reader's attention
2. clearly stated the topic of the paper
3. included a thesis statement.
Good

The introduction
1. attempted to grab the reader's attention
2. clearly stated the topic,
3. included a thesis statement.
Fair

The introduction
1. attempted to grab the reader's attention
2. clearly stated the topic
3. but did not include a thesis statement.
Poor

The introduction was missing two of the three main components:
1. grabbing the reader's attention
2. clearly stating the topic
3. thesis statement
Not Included

There was no introduction.
Body Content

Excellent

The paper was
1. well organized
2. used excellent transistions
3. included facts to support the author's point of view.
4. Included at least 3 interesting subtopics
Good

The paper was
1. mostly well organized
2. used transistions
3. included facts to support the author's point of view.
4. included at least 3 interesting subtopics
Fair

The paper was
1. somewhat organized
2. used some transistions
3. included some facts to support the author's point of view
4. included at least 2 interesting subtopics
Poor

The paper was
1. somewhat organized
2. used few transistions
3. included few facts to support the author's point of view
4. included at least 1 interesting subtopics
Not Included

The paper was unorganized, hard to follow, and did not seem to include any specific facts.
Conclusion

Excellent

The conclusion was interesting and connected back to the introduction. It gave a summary of the conclusions of the author, and left the reader wanting to know more.
Good

The conclusion was somewhat interesting and connected back to the introduction. It gave a summary of the conclusions of the author.
Fair

The conclusion connected back to the introduction. It gave a summary of the conclusions of the author.
Poor

The conclusion was generic and did not connect back to the introduction. It did not seem to relate to the topic. It did not summarize information.
Not Included

There was no conclusion.
Format

Excellent

The typed paper was:
1. at least 2 pages
2. Double spaced
3. 12 point font
4. one of the approved fonts.
5. Neat and easy to read

The handwritten paper was:
1. at least 4 pages
2. Written in Blue or Black pen
3. Double spaced
4. Written only on the front of the pages
5. Extremely neat and clean
Good

The typed paper did not meet one of the following requirements:
1. at least 2 pages
2. Double spaced
3. 12 point font
4. one of the approved fonts.
5. Neat and easy to read

The handwritten paper did not meet one of the following requirements:
1. at least 4 pages
2. Written in Blue or Black pen
3. Double spaced
4. Written only on the front of the pages
5. Extremely neat and clean
Fair

The typed paper did not meet two of the following requirements:
1. at least 2 pages
2. Double spaced
3. 12 point font
4. one of the approved fonts.
5. Neat and easy to read

The handwritten paper did not meet two of the following requirements:
1. at least 4 pages
2. Written in Blue or Black pen
3. Double spaced
4. Written only on the front of the pages
5. Extremely neat and clean
Poor

The typed paper did not meet three of the following requirements:
1. at least 2 pages
2. Double spaced
3. 12 point font
4. one of the approved fonts.
5. Neat and easy to read

The handwritten paper did not meet three of the following requirements:
1. at least 4 pages
2. Written in Blue or Black pen
3. Double spaced
4. Written only on the front of the pages
5. Extremely neat and clean
Not Included

The typed paper did not meet four or more of the following requirements:
1. at least 2 pages
2. Double spaced
3. 12 point font
4. one of the approved fonts.
5. Neat and easy to read

The handwritten paper did not meet four or more of the following requirements:
1. at least 4 pages
2. Written in Blue or Black pen
3. Double spaced
4. Written only on the front of the pages
5. Extremely neat and clean
Voice, Mechanics, CUPS

Excellent

The paper was very well-written. The author's voice was clear. Word choices and transistions enhanced the writing and created an excellent flow for the reader. There were few to no grammatical or spelling mistakes.
Good

The paper was well-written. The author's voice was present. Word choices and transistions were used to create a flow for the reader. There were 3-4 grammatical or spelling mistakes.
Fair

The paper was somewhat well-written. The author's voice was somewhat vague. Word choices and transistions were used, but did not create a flow for the reader. There were 5-6 grammatical or spelling mistakes.
Poor

The paper was poorly written. The author's voice was unclear. Word choices did not make sense and transistions were not used. Writing was choppy and hard to follow. There were 7-10 grammatical or spelling mistakes.
Not Included

The author copied every word from one of the sources. There were no original statements, paraphrasing, or infering in the writing. The writer did not use any transitions. The writing was extremely choppy and very hard to follow. There were more than 10 grammatical or spelling mistakes.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58