Skip to main content
iRubric: Rotten Orange Critics' Review:Think Deep rubric

iRubric: Rotten Orange Critics' Review:Think Deep rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rotten Orange Critics' Review:Think Deep 
Think Deep queries, comments and props per Fahrenheit 451, "Harrison Bergeron" and original narratives created by peers.
Rubric Code: YXA5W87
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Rotten Orange Critic's Review
Assessed per Rotten Orange Critics' Review
  Exceptional 100% - 20

(N/A)

Skilled 90% - 18

(N/A)

Proficient 85% - 17

(N/A)

Developing 74.5% - 15

(N/A)

Inadequate 68% - 14

0 pts

0 Did not submit

(N/A)

THINK DEEP

Exceptional 100% - 20

Think Deep queries and comments are astute, as they clearly and concisely relate to Fahrenheit 451, "Harrison Bergeron" and original narratives as well as are void of grammar or mechanical errors. Higher Level question reveals superb critical thinking skills and is void of grammar or mechanical errors.
Skilled 90% - 18

Think Deep queries and comments are significant, as they respond to Fahrenheit 451, "Harrison Bergeron" and original narratives. Additionally, the responses contain limited mechanical errors. Higher Level question is written at a skilled level and contains limited grammar or mechanical errors.
Proficient 85% - 17

Think Deep queries and comments are proficient, as they reveal some connection to Fahrenheit 451, "Harrison Bergeron" and original narratives. Additionally, the responses contain several grammar and mechanical erros. Higher Level question is written at a proficient level and contains several grammar or mechanical errors.
Developing 74.5% - 15

Think Deep queries and comments reveal inconsistent connection to Fahrenheit 451, "Harrison Bergeron" and original narratives . Additionally, the responses contain multiple grammar and mechanical errors. Higher Level question is written at a developing level with multiple grammar or mechanical errors, revealing lack of attention to detail.
Inadequate 68% - 14

Think Deep queries and comments per Fahrenheit 451, "Harrison Bergeron" and original narratives are ambiguous, as well as contain multiple errors in grammar and mechanics. Higher Level question is written at an inadequate level with numerous grammar or mechanical errors. Multiple errors impede understanding.
0 Did not submit




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16