- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Identity: Who Am I? What Am I? rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Identity: Who Am I? What Am I? Identity - Who and What Am I? For use by the gifted/talented student. Rubric Code: YAW36 By charliepitrolo Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Reading/Writing Process Creation of story board/outline & script to facilitate sequencing and fluid voice narration.
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 6 pts
Sequencing Prepared before creating multimedia product.	Poor Not performed.	Fair Partially performed.	Good Sufficiently performed.	Excellent Sufficiently performed using application software (i.e. Inspiration, FreeMind, etc.).
Scripting Rough/final draft	Poor A rough draft was not created.	Fair A rough draft was created, but not revised.	Good A rough draft was created and revised.	Excellent Rough draft was created & revised using word-prossessing application.
Multimedia Product
Elements Of the elements contributing to one's identity, the presentation included	Poor fewer than 3 elements.	Fair 3-4 elements.	Good 5-6 elements.	Excellent 7-8 elements.
Organization Elements of identity were presented	Poor with no semblance of order or organization.	Fair in a grouped or a chronological manner.	Good in a grouped and chronological manner.	Excellent in a grouped & chronological manner, & that alludes to the future.
Visuals Presentation included digital photos, video clips, & graphics.	Poor One of each &/or unoriginal (i.e. stock footage &/or images)	Fair 3-4 visuals; all digital and original	Good 5-6 visuals; all digital and original	Excellent 7-8 original digital visuals were incorporated.
Audio Types Incorporation of digital narrative and sound track:	Poor No digital audio types were used.	Fair One digital audio type was used.	Good Both digital audio types were used.	Excellent Both digital audio types were used. Modified to include special effects.
Audio Characteristics Fidelity and relevancy to presentation	Poor Pervasive distortion. Audio detracted from project.	Fair Some distortion. Audio had a neutral effect on project.	Good Negligible distortion. Audio provided positive effect.	Excellent No distortion. Audio complemented the presentation.