iRubric: W200 - Case Analysis Rubric Summer 2012

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

W200 - Case Analysis Rubric Summer 2012

For Summer 2012 IUPUC

Rubric Code: Y7B894

By garytwilson

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Case Information
	Missing 0 pts	Incomplete 1 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Case Information	Missing No information has been provided	Incomplete The case information section has not been fully completed. Items in the case have not been highlighted.	Poor Much of the case information is incomplete or missing. This may include the Case Information not completed, case not copy/pasted, or important information highlighted.	Fair Some of the parts of the case is incomplete or missing. These include two or more of the following three areas: the Case information is not finished, they did not copy paste the Case, they did not highlight areas of the case.	Good Case information is complete, but some information may not be highlighted or overlooked.	Excellent Case information is complete, which includes pasting the case in the space provided. The key case information is highlighted.
Part I: Standards and Needs
	Missing 0 pts	Incomplete 1 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Instructional Goals	Missing	Incomplete There are not enough instructional goals to achieve the standard. The goals are not thoroughly and accurately stated.	Poor There are not enough goals to achieve the standard. The goals are stated, but not clearly.	Fair There are enough instructional goals to achieve the standard. But the goals are not thoroughly and accurately stated.	Good There are enough instructional goals based on the standard, but some are not thoroughly or accurately stated.	Excellent There are enough instructional goals based on the standard. The goals are thorough and accurate to achieve the standards.
Instructional Needs	Missing	Incomplete None of the needs stated accurately reflect the case's needs, and they are not thorough.	Poor	Fair Several needs have been accurately listed but not thoroughly stated.	Good	Excellent All of the needs founded in the case are listed thoroughly and accurately.
Step II: Technology Options
	Missing 0 pts	Incomplete 1 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Problems	Missing	Incomplete None of the problems/difficulties in achieving the instructional goals have been identified and explained clearly.	Poor	Fair A few of the problems/difficulties in achieving the instructional goals have not been identified and explained clearly.	Good	Excellent All problems/difficulties in achieving the instructional goals are identified and explained clearly.
Technology Options	Missing	Incomplete None of the technology options are strongly relevant to its corresponding problems/difficulties.	Poor	Fair Technology options are somewhat relevant to the corresponding problems/difficulties.	Good	Excellent Technology options are strongly relevant to its corresponding problems/difficulties.
Number of Options	Missing	Incomplete Less than five specific tools/resources per student are listed properly.	Poor	Fair Eight specific tools/resources per student are listed.Only one option is provided for some problems. Or there are broken links.	Good	Excellent Minimum of ten specific tools/resources per student are listed properly and at least two options are provided for each problem/difficulty identifies. Link to each option is given.
Description	Missing	Incomplete The description does not specifically and sufficiently explain the features of the technology option to solve the problem in achieving the corresponding instructional goal.	Poor	Fair The description mostly provides specific and sufficient explanations of the features of the technology option to solve the problem in achieving the corresponding instructional goal.	Good	Excellent The description specifically and sufficiently explains the feature of the technology option to solve the problem in achieving the corresponding instructional goal. These are thorough descriptions.
Step III: Sequence
	Missing 0 pts	Incomplete 3 pts	Poor 6 pts	Fair 9 pts	Good 12 pts	Excellent 15 pts
Sequence	Missing	Incomplete There is a no clear alignment of the selected technology with the problems/difficulties in achieving the instructional goals. The description does not fully explain what students would do with the tool/resource and what the teacher would do with the tool/resource.	Poor	Fair The description is somewhat in alignment of the selected technology with the problems/difficulties in achieving the instructional goals. The description somewhat provides a full explain what students would do with the tool/resource and what the teacher would do with the tool/resource.	Good	Excellent There is a clear alignment of the selected technology with the problems/difficulties in achieving the instructional goals. The description fully explains what students would do with the tool/resource and what the teacher would do with the tool/resource.
Step IV: Task Identification
	Missing 0 pts	Incomplete 2 pts	Poor 4 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Task Identification	Missing	Incomplete All most all of the learning tasks have not been identified clearly and accurately.	Poor	Fair A few of the learning tasks have not been identified clearly and accurately.	Good	Excellent All learning tasks are identified clearly and accurately. STEP IV. Reflection
Step IV: Reflection
	Missing 0 pts	Incomplete 2 pts	Poor 4 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Selected Tech, Standards, and Needs	Missing	Incomplete Almost none of the technology decisions meet all the needs and the standards in details.	Poor	Fair A few of the technology decisions do not meet all the needs and the standards in details.	Good	Excellent Fully addresses how the technology decisions meet all the needs and the standards in details.
Justification	Missing	Incomplete Justifications for both instruction and assessment are weak and lack clarity. The three Es are not explained at all.	Poor	Fair A few of the justifications for either instruction or assessment are somewhat weak and lack clarity. The three Es are not properly explained.	Good	Excellent Justifications for both instruction and assessment are rational and specific and show good understanding of the three Es.

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric