- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Evidence-based Practice Discussion rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Evidence-based Practice Discussion Evidence-based Practice Discussion Rubric Code: Y2W3589 By Kainie Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Nursing Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

EBP Article Discussion
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 5 pts
Discussion of Article	Poor Fails to relate EBP concept(s) from article. EBP Does not provide examples of real life scenarios. Asked question/s that are not pertinent to the conversation.	Fair Related concept(s) from article to course objectives but fails to provide examples of real life scenarios.Asked questions that demonstrates a summary or repeat of the information.	Good Relates concept(s) in from article to course objectives. Provides specific examples of real life scenarios in which student has observed or applied concept(s) in clinical practice. Asked questions that demonstrates original thinking.
Orgainization	Poor Complete lack of transition of ideas. 50 % or more of statements are vague.	Fair 50 % or less of ideas fail to flow smoothly. 50 % or less of statements are unclear.	Good Smooth flow of ideas. Statements are clear and concise.
Preparation	Poor Was not prepared for the discussion and used notes/computer for about 75% of the time	Fair Prepared for discussion use of notes/computer for about 50% of the time	Good Fully prepared for discussion, limited use of notes/computer of 25% or less of the time
Listening	Poor Did not listen carefully or respectfully to classmates, many side conversations, spacing out	Fair Listened carefully and respectfully to some of my classmates during each discussion, participated in at least on side conversation	Good Listened carefully and respectfully to all of my classmates during each discussion, did not have side conversations
Converse	Poor Did not contribute to the discussion	Fair Contribution of few meaning comments based on the topics of discussion and did not control the conversation, allowed others to participate	Good Provided several meaning comments based on the topics of discussion and did not control the conversation, allowed others to participate