iRubric: Interactive Post Creation rubric

The selected subject is interesting and well-defined. The presentation is polished, visually consistent, and logically organized. The design improves the audience's comprehension.

The subject is well-defined. The arrangement is structured and visually appealing, using a template or a custom design effectively. The organization is simple to navigate.

The subject is included but might be superficial. The arrangement appears a bit disorganized or uneven. The visual presentations somewhat detract from the material.

The topic should be stated more clearly or added if missing. Organizing the layout and making it easier to follow would help, and improving the design could make it more attractive.

There are more than three interactive features, such as Hotspots and Windows, used creatively. Each feature is clearly labeled or easy to understand, and they all help make the user experience much richer.

There are three interactive features included. Each one has a label, and all the buttons work as intended by taking users to the correct place.

You used fewer than three interactive features or did not label them clearly. Some of the interactions are confusing or repeated.

There is little or no interactivity. Some features do not work or lead to dead ends. Labels are missing.

Every image, video, and audio clip is thoughtfully credited, with sources clearly listed in dedicated slides or tooltips. Royalty-free and Creative Commons assets are chosen and used with care

You have cited most external sources, and it’s clear you tried to acknowledge them. However, one or two sources may be missing or incorrectly formatted.

Some citations are unclear or inconsistent, such as only listing "Google Images. "It is also not always clear which parts are your own work and which are taken from other sources.

There are no citations or credits in this content, which could lead to copyright infringement or plagiarism concerns.

The content is easy to follow, so users do not feel lost or stuck on any slide. Home and Back buttons are always there when needed, and the navigation works smoothly.

Navigation is smooth, and users can move forward and backward without trouble. There are a few small logic issues, such as a missing\\"Back\\" button on one sub-page.

The navigation can be confusing, and users might end up clicking around to figure out where to go next. The overall flow feels choppy.

Navigation paths are broken. Users can get stuck on a page without a way to go back or move forward. The order of pages does not make sense.

The writing is clear, polished, and professional. The tone matches the topic well, such as being enthusiastic for a hobby or a formal profile.

Your writing is clear and has only a few minor errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling. The tone stays consistent and fits the purpose.

There are some grammatical and spelling mistakes that sometimes make the message unclear. The tone also changes in places, moving from formal language to slang.

There are several grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors that make your writing hard to follow. Also, the tone does not meet the assignment's requirements.